.45 ACP Truncated Cone Plated 185-gr bullet over 6.0 gr of Win-231?

Status
Not open for further replies.

IMtheNRA

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
1,372
I have some mystery plated bullets of unknown manufacturer that I'd like to use to make light .45 ACP plinking loads.

Hodgdon's web site does not have data on 185-gr plated bullets, but my Speer manual has data for a 185-gr Gold Dot bullet, which is also plated. Win-231 range is 6.6 to 7.4 grains. Hornady manual has a charge range of 5.9 to 7.2 grains for their FMJ 185-gr SWC and HP bullets.

I was wondering if you think it is safe to try a 6.0 grain charge of Winchester-231 and seating the bullet to make overall length of 1.200 ?
 
Yes, it would be a safe charge.

The 1.2" OAL may or may not be, depending on whether or not that length will pass the Plunk Test in your chamber.


Lyman #49 shows a 185 Remington JHP & W231.

Start load is 4.4 grains = 640 FPS.

Max load is 6.1 = 937 FPS.

Was I you though, I would start at 5.0 grains slowly and work up to 6.0.

BTW: The Speer Gold-Dot is plated, but much thicker plating then common plated bullets.

You can't use Gold Dot data with normal plated bullets.

rc
 
If it was me, I'd start at 6.2 and work up to 7.3.

When I work new loads, I average the start of every source I can get my hands on and then I do the same for the max. I figure this way, it'll never be too weak as to get a squib, and I won't ever go over the max listed. Keeps me safe.
 
Avoiding loads that are too light to cycle my G-21-C is the reason I was thinking of 6.0 grains of W-231.

You see, last night, I loaded and shot some 200-grain plated bullets over 6.0 grains. The recoil was very, very light, and the sides of the cases had big scorch marks, which I thought was a sign of a very light load. This is why I thought that 6.0 grains with lighter, 185-grain plated bullet, might turn out to be an even lighter load.
 
If it was me, I'd start at 6.2 and work up to 7.3.

When I work new loads, I average the start of every source I can get my hands on and then I do the same for the max. I figure this way, it'll never be too weak as to get a squib, and I won't ever go over the max listed. Keeps me safe.
So you'd start above the max load recommended by Lyman and Hodgdon/Winchester and work up from there??

185 GR. HDY JSWC Winchester 231 .451" 1.135" 5.0 762 12,000 CUP 5.9 906 15,800 CUP
 
I was simply going by what the OP research showed.

Moral of the story was to take the averages of start and max and use that as start and max. I would NEVER start above max.
 
I didn't take it as a recommendation to start above max. The bullet in that loading data is not the same as the one I intend to load. Hodgdon/Winchester, Hornady, Speer, and Lyman all have a huge, and I mean, huge differences in their load data - all for bullets that are different from my plated 185-grain TC style bullet, and all with different COAL measurements.

Some of the manuals' max loads are less than the starting loads in other manuals...

Personally, I suspect that 6 grains is too low - so low, that I was wondering if it is safe to load with only 6 grains of W-231.
 
I have never loaded or shot any 185grn bullets but I would think 6grn of 231 would move that bullet nicely down the barrel.

Dave,
 
I shoot 6.2gr w231 with a 185gr plated fp. Only gets me about 850fps from a 4.5" barrel.
 
If anyone's wondering, I tested this load. Made ten rounds and they cycled the Glock 21-C each time, so they're not too weak. Very mild recoil impulse, and significantly less loud than my standard 230-FMJ loads, which also have 6.0 grains of W-231.

I had to set my COAL range at 1.167 to 1.173 in order for the entire batch to pass the "plunk test" in my Glock barrel.

Accuracy was pretty bad - 10 rounds, 2.75 inches at 13 yards (two hand hold), but acceptable for non-precision shooting, like IDPA & IPSC. Wouldn't trust this accuracy for pins, but it'll do for the other activities.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top