cxm
Member
Independent Confirmation of Data
I have had several books published that contain collected data... and I can agree in a general way about not releasing data.
HOWEVER, when independent statistical analysis of your data indicated claims there may be serious problems with the data, your methods or your conclusions scientific method demands you provide sufficient data so other researchers can duplicate and confirm your research and conclusions.
We should recognize, that while the M&S study isn't perfect for a number of reasons...it remains potentially one of the best we have had in quite a few yars.
In the case of shootings, I surely understand why Mr. Marshall would not release all his data. I am disappointed however he will not release the data to support some... say two calibres for example. Such release would allow those who believe he is correct in his study and analysis to put the contraversy to bed once and for all. Until that happens, the data will be questioned.
Until there is independent duplication of at least a part of the M&S study, there will be serious disagreement about the information. For one I'd like to see the study confirmed and the arguement ended.
FWIW
Chuck
I knew this would come up, but it is total BS. No professional researcher ever releases his raw data for free if he can help it. Sometimes whomever paid for the study contractually requires you to release it, but in general you hold on to it like it was made of gold. This is because it is made of gold, since you spent good money to collect that data. You release your methodology for free and if the other guy has the money he can recreate your database. This is how it works in the real world. Anyone who says different is kidding you about his research credentials.
I have had several books published that contain collected data... and I can agree in a general way about not releasing data.
HOWEVER, when independent statistical analysis of your data indicated claims there may be serious problems with the data, your methods or your conclusions scientific method demands you provide sufficient data so other researchers can duplicate and confirm your research and conclusions.
We should recognize, that while the M&S study isn't perfect for a number of reasons...it remains potentially one of the best we have had in quite a few yars.
In the case of shootings, I surely understand why Mr. Marshall would not release all his data. I am disappointed however he will not release the data to support some... say two calibres for example. Such release would allow those who believe he is correct in his study and analysis to put the contraversy to bed once and for all. Until that happens, the data will be questioned.
Until there is independent duplication of at least a part of the M&S study, there will be serious disagreement about the information. For one I'd like to see the study confirmed and the arguement ended.
FWIW
Chuck
I knew this would come up, but it is total BS. No professional researcher ever releases his raw data for free if he can help it. Sometimes whomever paid for the study contractually requires you to release it, but in general you hold on to it like it was made of gold. This is because it is made of gold, since you spent good money to collect that data. You release your methodology for free and if the other guy has the money he can recreate your database. This is how it works in the real world. Anyone who says different is kidding you about his research credentials.
