stiletto raggio
Member
I read an interesting thread on long-range practical rifle matches in which Zak Smith recommended the 7mm Rem Mag over the .338 Lapua for virtually all civilian shooters. Lighter gun less reocil, cheaper ammo, etc.
I have a friend building me a 6.5x284 on a 1903 Springfield action. It will have a beautiful stock and finish, so it is not really something I'd want to drop on rocks at a match. The question is, if I will already be reloading for that rifle, does it make more sense to go with a 6.5x284 than a 7mm Rem Mag for a purpose-built practical gun? Brass costs more but with 140 grain bullets, the 6.5 matches the Rem Mag for velocity and does so with a better BC. Brass costs about 50% more for the 6.5, but it does require less variation in reloading supplies and bullet stock.
I have a friend building me a 6.5x284 on a 1903 Springfield action. It will have a beautiful stock and finish, so it is not really something I'd want to drop on rocks at a match. The question is, if I will already be reloading for that rifle, does it make more sense to go with a 6.5x284 than a 7mm Rem Mag for a purpose-built practical gun? Brass costs more but with 140 grain bullets, the 6.5 matches the Rem Mag for velocity and does so with a better BC. Brass costs about 50% more for the 6.5, but it does require less variation in reloading supplies and bullet stock.
Last edited: