A Canadian got it.

Status
Not open for further replies.

SomeKid

Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2005
Messages
1,544
Location
FL
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52041

What can we do to stop lunatics with guns?
Posted: September 19, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Christopher di Armani

On Dec. 6, 1989, a lunatic took a rifle into a Montreal school and brutally murdered 14 young women and wounded an additional 13.

With the battle cry of "Never Again!" the government-of-the-day introduced Bill C-68, Canada's Firearms Act, and passed it into law in 1995.

On Sept. 13, 2006, another lunatic took another rifle into another Montreal school, brutally murdered one young woman and wounded another 20 people.

Bill C-68 (the Firearms Act) could not stop Kimveer Gill on Sept. 13, 2006, anymore than it could have stopped Gamil Gharbi (aka Marc Lepine) on Dec. 6, 1989.

Both Gharbi and Gill were vetted by the authorities of the day. Both were cleared by the government and "given permission" to purchase their firearms.

Neither the Firearms Acquisition Certificate questions asked of Gharbi nor the Possession and Acquisition License questions asked of Gill tipped off those guarding our public safety that these young men were deranged and dangerous.

Those who continually cry for more "gun control" refuse to learn the fundamental truth these heinous crimes teach those of us with the ears to hear:

Society cannot legislate sanity.

There is nothing government can do to stop someone from going crazy and going on a murderous rampage.

All we can do is stop them once they've already gone mad and started killing.

Who do we call when this happens?

Someone with the means and ability to stop the killer ... someone with a gun.

In Canada it is "unthinkable" that we citizens are capable of defending ourselves when a madman starts shooting.

Instead, panicked and terrified, we frantically dial 9-1-1 and pray to God we aren't dead by the time "someone with a gun" arrives to save us.

It would be so much simpler to cut out the middleman and the high death toll, don't you think?

What if the first student confronted by Gamil Gharbi and his rifle that awful December day, instead of cowering and dying, had pulled a concealed-carry handgun from her purse and shot him dead?

Even if her actions were not in time to save her own life, 13 other young women would be alive today, celebrating her training and foresight each Dec. 6.

Instead, every year we allow the "grief industry" to tell us over and over how powerless we are. We allow the "victim culture" to grow. We allow ourselves to believe the lie that we cannot defend ourselves.

What if one of the first young men confronted by Kimveer Gill had pulled his own concealed-carry pistol and shot Gill dead?

Instead of mourning the death Anastasia De Souza and facing his own impotence, he could instead stand tall, knowing his training and foresight saved Anastasia's life.

When will Canadians comprehend the simple truth Israel learned back in the '70s when Muslim terrorists were murdering Israeli children in their schools: Gun-Free Zones only protect the killers – not their intended victims. Once Israel armed their teachers, attacks on schools stopped. Immediately.

One day we must face the truth: Licensing and registration of firearms does not work.

On that day we must look for real-world solutions to this problem, instead of the politically expedient knee-jerk reactions that keep killing our young people.

After all, the goal is to save lives, isn't it?

Related special offer:

"Armed Response: A Comprehensive Guide to Using Firearms for Self-Defense"

Christopher di Armani is a freelance writer based in Lytton, British Columbia. He can be contacted by e-mail or visited on the web at diArmani.com.
 
Too bad they're doomed. They may, indeed, get their registration system removed, but that changes nothing. They still won't be able to own much of anything, let alone carry. Sure, you can now have your shotgun, which we wont ask you to register, but you'll still have to wait a year and jump through paperwork hoops in order to get it. AND, you can't buy ammo unless we allow you to.

Same thing in the UK. They are never going to get their rights back to the point they were 30 years ago. Once you go down that slope, you may slow the descent or delay it, but you're never going back up it again.
 
Unfortunately, the Canadians are more likely to say that all guns should be banned period.
 
In Canada it is "unthinkable" that we citizens are capable of defending ourselves when a madman starts shooting.

Instead, panicked and terrified, we frantically dial 9-1-1 and pray to God we aren't dead by the time "someone with a gun" arrives to save us.

That should be the answer EVERY FREAKING TIME someone appears in an interview and is questioned about why people need guns.

That what people do when they call 911 is call "a man with a gun" to save them.

Why not save yourself?
 
Unfortunately, the Canadians are more likely to say that all guns should be banned period.

No, it is the victim mentality Canadians living in the larger cities that will say all guns need to be banned, plenty of us that are "too stupid" or "too redneck" to live in a big city want less gun control.

I'm one of the Canadians that has the same opinion as the author, if someone had a CPL at these schools, the person (not the inanimate device) who chose to do evil that day would end up at the receiving end of firearm and be stopped in their tracks before things escalated.

Don't lump all of us Canadians together ...:fire:
 
MD Willington said:
Don't lump all of us Canadians together

This is an excellent point.

Many of my countrymen don't realize just how far the leftist campaign of culture distortion and destruction has gone in Canada.

Here in America the urban leftists talk about banning guns for the sake of the children while claiming to respect the rights of hunters.

In Canada, though, that's not always the case. I've read things from mainstream Canadian periodicals where antis are openly saying that gun control is part of an effort to destroy "patriarchal" rural society. That sort of overtly hostile cultural divide is mind-boggling and definitely growing here in the States.
 
--------quote-------
Here in America the urban leftists talk about banning guns for the sake of the children while claiming to respect the rights of hunters.

In Canada, though, that's not always the case. I've read things from mainstream Canadian periodicals where antis are openly saying that gun control is part of an effort to destroy "patriarchal" rural society.
---------------------

That may be what the lefties SAY here in America, but it's not what they MEAN. In reality, their views have much in common with their Canadian comrades who want to destroy rural culture.

Anyone who really believes Dianne Fienstein and Hilary Clinton genuinely respect Deer Hunting Bubba Culture needs a reality check. Particularly sad are the actual hunters who fall for this propaganda ploy. Think Hilary's just after my AR15? Sorry, Bubba: your scoped bolt rifle is next on the list.
 
There's a reason why these shooting sprees/mass shootings occur in "Gun Free Zones". It's because it's safe for the shooter for however long it takes for the cops to show up. It maximizes their time to inflict as much death as possible. Shooting sprees at police stations and gun stores don't yield the desired effect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top