Accidental SWAT shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yakko

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
105
Location
Oregon
http://www.registerguard.com/news/2007/01/23/e1.cr.shoot.0123.p1.php?section=cityregion

Accidental shooting injures police officer
By Rebecca Nolan
The Register-Guard
Published: Tuesday, January 23, 2007

A Eugene police SWAT officer was shot in the foot Monday when another officer's gun accidentally discharged at the home of a suspected drug dealer, police officials said.

A bullet from a SWAT 9mm long gun went through the injured officer's foot shortly before 6 a.m., police Capt. Pete Kerns said.

"This is what I would classify as an industrial accident for law enforcement," Kerns said. "This was not a friendly fire incident, but a mechanical failure or an error on the part of the person carrying the gun."

The department's violent crimes unit was investigating.

The officers' names were not released.

The department's vice narcotics unit had asked SWAT to help serve a search warrant at a home on North Danebo Avenue near Barger Drive. Detectives suspected that a man with a history of weapon possession was dealing drugs from the home, Kerns said.

advertisement SWAT officers entered the house, rounded up the occupants and searched for any hazards, Kerns said. They were preparing to hand the scene over to detectives when the shooting occurred.

Apparently, three SWAT officers assigned to cover the backyard of the home were climbing a fence to get out. One of the officers' guns fired and hit the other officer.

Paramedics already were on scene and immediately came to the injured officer's aid, Kerns said. The officer was taken to the hospital for treatment.

Kerns said the department would not release the injured officer's name because he has a large family that needed to be notified of the accident. The officer has been with the department for nearly three years.

The officer whose gun discharged is a "veteran police officer," Kerns said. His name was withheld because he is the subject of an internal investigation, the captain said. Monday was that officer's regular day off, and he will be allowed to return to work as scheduled.

"It is not a standard of ours in cases of accidental discharges to place officers on administrative leave," Kerns said.

SWAT officers are among any police department's most highly trained and skilled officers, and as a result such accidental shootings are rare, Kerns said.

However, in Eugene, the last accidental shooting of one officer by another occurred in 2001, when a SWAT sniper mistook another SWAT officer, Sgt. Jay Shadwick, for an armed suspect and shot him once in the chest while responding to an attempted murder in Creswell.

Shadwick survived and returned to work six months later.

An investigation found no negligence on the part of the sniper, officer Ted Williams, or his spotter, officer Jud Warden.

Once investigators establish the facts of Monday's shooting, the department will evaluate whether additional training or weaponry changes are necessary, Kerns said.
 
"This is what I would classify as an industrial accident for law enforcement," Kerns said. "This was not a friendly fire incident, but a mechanical failure or an error on the part of the person carrying the gun."

I would like to see gunmakers releasing public statements and demanding that the departments qualify that it was the cop's error and NOT a "mechanical failure" on the part of their product.

This is asinine. Do they also blame Ford or GM when they drive a cruiser into a tree?
 
KYFFOTFT. Simple as that. If you have the time to raise the weapon, you have time to place your finger on the trigger.
 
Manedwolf, that line struck me as funny as well. If someone shoots one of their allies is that not friendly fire?

XDKingslayer said
No, they only blame Ford when they get hit in the rear and catch on fire.
Then they get POd when they sue Ford and Ford tells them to pound sand when the they try to order more cars.
 
Ditchtiger said:
This is not the first industrial accident for Eugene's finest.
Industrial? Is that because of the amount of damage done?
 
Forget high or low ready. They were leaving the scene after it had been cleared, by the SWAT team, and turned over to the detectives.

They were climbing over a fence in the rear of a house to leave the scene, for whatever reason, instead of walking out the gate or through the house. Let's give em the benefit of the doubt and assume they were doing it for real "crime scene" reasons instead of just not wanting to take the long way out of laziness.

So, the threat was cleared and they still had holstered sidearms for defense. There's no reason they couldn't have unloaded or at least safed their long gun and had someone hold it (heck if there were three of them one guy could be providing cover) while they crossed the fence, just like 8 year old kids learn in hunter's ed.
 
SWAT officers entered the house, rounded up the occupants and searched for any hazards, Kerns said. They were preparing to hand the scene over to detectives when the shooting occurred.

Apparently, three SWAT officers assigned to cover the backyard of the home were climbing a fence to get out. One of the officers' guns fired and hit the other officer.

Paramedics already were on scene and immediately came to the injured officer's aid, Kerns said. The officer was taken to the hospital for treatment.

I was just going off the posted story. It would be easier to understand if it had happened going in.
 
In the PA hunter safety course they told us never to climb a fence with a rifle. You should hand it to someone to hold for you, or place it on the ground and slide it under the fence. I guess this is why.

I know SWAT probably wouldn't do this, but they must have some kind of protocol.
 
I don't hear so good anymore,(hoby related plus work as a mechanic) just heard the story on the TV. Who really cares but the guy shot in the foot and the shooter. The excuses and finger pointing to came will be interesting. Will post if it's of interest.
 
Usually hear about one or two stories like this every year. Even though they're suppose to be pro's, they're still human and mistakes do happen.
 
In the PA hunter safety course they told us never to climb a fence with a rifle.

Same thing in NY, I took the course when I was 16. But I actually learned this when I was about 6.

Sure sounds like negligence, but maybe there's to this story.
 
You know how funny this must have been? I mean, it's a terrible situation, but come on. Just imagine the whole picture. You have SWAT, whom is supposed to be the bad boys, get the cool toys, wear the cool uniforms, etc, and BANG!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top