I don't know if it is just me, but I every time I pick up a gun magazine they either praise every single peice of **** gun in the magazine or they have a review on a gun that might be worth having but the picture they show is a gun that has had $300 worth of customization on it.
Example:
The Harris Outdoor Group Presents #57 issue of "Concealed Carry Handguns"
has a picture of a standard new in box Springfield XD .45 compact of the cover. But...when you got to the article the writer has had his XD .45 compact customized with a fully stippled grip? and rounded off trigger guard?
The question is...Is it really appropriate to rate a gun that you have had personalized yourself, and couldn't you just do this with a dremal tool and saved the money?
It seems very misleading.
Example:
The Harris Outdoor Group Presents #57 issue of "Concealed Carry Handguns"
has a picture of a standard new in box Springfield XD .45 compact of the cover. But...when you got to the article the writer has had his XD .45 compact customized with a fully stippled grip? and rounded off trigger guard?
The question is...Is it really appropriate to rate a gun that you have had personalized yourself, and couldn't you just do this with a dremal tool and saved the money?
It seems very misleading.