there is one in every thread...you know EXACTLY what i meant when i asked the questions. -----AgainstThaGrane
It is a proverbialism that "There's-One-In-Every-Crowd".
The question relevent here is, which vaguely worded ONE are you or I referring to?
For example, the common claim that other persons know EXACTLY what you mean actually is a common assumption, and often as not, it is entirely erroneous. Do you realize how delusional it is to assume that other persons can read your mind?
Insofar as you are adopting an ideological position that is strikingly similar to Animal Rights Activism, you may be darned well correct that I know EXACTLY what you mean.
_____________________________________________
"...you have to dissect what i wrote in the hopes of making yourself feel more intelligent."----AgainstThaGrane
If you wish to engage in Animal Rights Activism, that's okay; but you will be engaged rationally. REASON is the product and cause of Western Civilizations status.
_______________________________________________
"...next time i want to be graded on a post i'll put an APA cover sheet and heading on it. :/"---AgainstThaGrane
This is indeed one of the fundamental contradictions regarding public communication today. You initiate a public discussion suggestive of Animal Rights Activism, in a PUBLIC FORUM, then suggest some equally vague moral or ethic has been violated, and you cannot even clarify what that is with clear reason.
That's rather like a shell game wherein you opt to identify with some kind of woundedness.
______________________________________________
"i know i'm not right or wrong."----AgainstThaGrane
That's odd. You haven't demonstrated by rational thought that you are "not right or wrong". Neither does anyone else have any knowledge that this was already determined.
What I wrote, was an indication that nobody is of necessity, either Right or Wrong merely because their view is popular or unpopular, or in the majority or minority; but the distinction between what I wrote, and what you are indicating here, is that you now claim that you are, in fact, neither Right or Wrong. How can anybody exclude themselves from either part of a clear dichotomy?
_______________________________________
"i didn't say i was judging."----AgainstThaGrane
What you have here is a DENIAL of the very thing you are doing. However, since you have a vaguely worded proposition, you aren't likely to engage the proposition well, or in any meaningful depth. That is also characteristic of Animal Rights Activism. Rationally, the moral and ethical propositions are so vaccuous that any rationalist can entirely dismantle them. When that occurs in print, Animal Rights Activism shows itself to be entirely irrational.
"you can totally eat what you love,"---AgainstThaGrane
I don't derive the power or ability to do that from you. In fact, you are NARROWLY describing what I CAN eat. Now, by reason, I am only ALLOWED to eat IF I love it, and not allowed to eat what I do NOT love. That's ridiculous.
"have you ever had a girlfriend"-----AgainstThaGrain
Have you ever been more irrelevent? What has my personal life to do with it, and what right to you have making inquiries in a PUBLIC FORUM about my personal life?
At the very least, such a question offers you a 50% chance that the answer will be "No" and the reason you ask it is to shift the topic of topic from relevent ideas, so that you can engage in a very "low road" form of shaming behavior, which is a common feature in the Politically Correct movement and in irrational advocacies found in Animal Rights Activism. If you wish to discuss sex life issues, you might try a forum dedicated to that purpose. I do not believe this is the proper place for discussing sexuality or relationships. Do you?
Thank you very much.
/
/