"Arming America" book left on the shelf

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bob Locke

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
440
Location
Greeley, CO
Library won't ban books

The Weld Library District board closed the book on two censorship requests Monday and a third request is pending.

Library board members agreed to keep "The Cat Who Killed Lilian Jackson Braun: A Parody" and " Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture" on the shelves.

Greeley resident Nancy Derby, 65, asked the board to toss

"The Cat who Killed Lilian Jackson Braun," after she read the first few pages and discovered the parody was more than innocent jokes about one of Derby's favorite cat-loving novelists.

The opening of the novel has Braun's severed head floating in the toilet of a gay bar, which is about where Derby lost interest, she said.

"I am not a prude by any means," Derby said. But Derby wanted to keep the book away from young patrons who, like her grandchildren, love Lilian Braun books, she said.

Still, library board members held fast to the idea that public libraries are designed to provide a broad range of materials that readers can choose from, even if some deem them offensive.

That mission is in line with the American Library Associations' censorship stance. The ALA's Library Bill of Rights says libraries should challenge censorship requests as a way of fulfilling their responsibility to enlighten and inform the public.

Derby said she'll let the matter rest.

"If this is their decision, I will abide by it," she said.

Jerry Hendrickson, the man who wanted the library board to pluck "Arming America" from the shelves, was unavailable for comment. In his request for removal, Hendrickson said the book - which centers on the idea that few Americans kept or condoned guns before the Civil War - was an example of "revisionist history."

The book's subject matter is not its only source of controversy: Author Michael A. Bellesiles stepped down from his job as a university professor after it was revealed that sources and information in his book were likely fabricated.

Library board member Rosalie Martinez said the book should stay in the library collection, despite the dubious nature of some of its contents, because it represents a particular point of view on guns.

Still, the library district agreed to add a book that provides a pro-gun counter-point to "Arming America." The district is adding "Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture and the Law" to its collection.

The censorship requests on "Arming America" and "The Cat Who Killed" are not the first the library board has handled - and they won't be the last.

Next month, the board will consider Evans resident Jeannie McAllister's request to remove an adolescent sexuality book called "It's Perfectly Normal," from the district collection.

McAllister, a 33-year-old mother of four, said she usually screens her kids' library books. But the day they grabbed "It's Perfectly Normal," they chose too many for her to check, she said.

McAllister was later horrified to see that the book her 8- and 5-year-old flipped through contained illustrations of naked people, a man with an erection, and a couple having sex, she said.

"I would call it mildly pornographic," McAllister said.

Recent history shows that the Weld Library Board is loathe to censor books no matter what the reason. But McAllister said she won't accept "no" for an answer.

If "It's Perfectly Normal" is not removed, McAllister said she will circulate petitions and possibly even picket the library.

"I don't want to have to do this, but I will because that's how strongly I feel about it," she said.
 
They published my LTE in today's paper:

"Library should not consider book as legitimate research"

In the "Library won't ban books" article in Tuesday's Tribune, it was reported that library board member Rosalie Martinez said the "Arming America" book should remain in the shelves "because it represents a particular point on view on guns".

The book has been totally debunked as historically and factually inaccurate, and its author has been forced from his position at a major university for fabricating the vast majority of it. In short, it is a total farce that is masquerading as research into this nation's past. The book will have a definite, negative impact on the people who read it and take it to heart as factual.

It is not censorship when you refuse to provide a place on the shelves for materials shown to be false in nature, particularly when those materials are agenda-driven and designed to influence public opinion.

At the very least, the library should move "Arming America" to the fiction section. It has no place alongside legitimate pieces of research.

The paper then (not surprisingly) had an editorial piece praising the board's decision, which was to add a pro-gun piece of work to their collection as an offset to the fabrication. How that's supposed to add up, I fail to see.
 
One of my best friends has a master's in library sciences and consequently spent a lot of her class time on this subject.

Her one non-liberal belief is that libraries are storehouses for books to be borrowed by people. Period. It is up to parents and guardians to censor what the children read.

Frankly, I agree with her. I think I would be just as mad to know the library was censoring conservative, Christian, or republican/libertarian material. It is not okay just to censor the ideas and ideals of the opposing side.

Moreover, as a government funded entity, I think neutrality is absolutely required.

I think the only thing I disagree with is that the Bellisiles (sp?) book shouldn't have been requested to be removed, just reshelved where it belongs: in the fiction section.
 
What I want to know is who does anyone think they are telling a library that a certain book cannot be on the shelf. What happened to freedom of speech?

GT
 
What I want to know is who does anyone think they are telling a library that a certain book cannot be on the shelf. What happened to freedom of speech?

Well, since freedom of speech and library censorship are not related in any way, I'd say, "nothing."
 
Actually, I like for people to read "Arming America" and then I like to send them to [ur]http://www.guncite.com/[/url] just so they can get a good sense of how far the anti-gun crowd will go in lying to promote their agenda.
 
The problem I have is that the book is being presented as a factual piece of research, when it has been debunked as a fabrication. To me, giving it a place among pieces of legitimate, substantiated work is totally against the mission of a library or other place of learning. By allowing it to stay, they are assisting in promulgating the fallacies contained in the book.

I have no problem with the ideal of the marketplace of competing ideas. What does bother me is that this book, a known fraud, is being presented to the public as factual. Putting another book on the shelves with a competing viewpoint simply sets up a my-word-against-your-word scenario. It doesn't make the non-factual writing go away, and that's a disservice, IMO.
 
Is the library willing to stock other books based on fraud?

It's not a question of censorship.

The library doesn't stock the phony racist rantings of characters like David Duke. They are based on haterd and a false pseudo science. So is Arming America.

My libraries two copies turned up missing in the stacks somewhere. Misfiled apparently soemwhere

Civil Disobedience?

Don P.
 
As long as the book is moved to the Fantasy section, I have no problem with it.
 
Actually, I like for people to read "Arming America" and then I like to send them to [ur]http://www.guncite.com/[/url] just so they can get a good sense of how far the anti-gun crowd will go in lying to promote their agenda.

Sometimes I wonder if we should lie to push back gun oppressors....

"Guys with guns get more chicks"

"Women with guns are just plain sexy."

Wait, who am I kidding? Those aren't lies... ;)
 
Print up some neon orange stickers that say something to the effect of: "The 'x' public library is keeping this book in circulation as an example of scholarly fraud, not as an example of legitimate research into the gun issue. The author has been found to have fabricated much of his research and was fired from his tenured position at Emory University. For more information on this matter please go to (insert a good website here, one that does a good point by point shredding of AA)". Put the stickers on the inside covers of the book or on the title page (or even all three :D ).

That way it can be done without a fuss (and probably without the library knowing about it :evil: ) & because it looks & sounds somewhat official the reader might just go check out the referenced site.

Greg
 
Michael A. Bellesiles stepped down from his job as a university professor

You might also want to mention that :

1. The Newberry Library in Chicago revoked a $30,000 grant previously awarded to Bellesiles.

2. Columbia University withdrew the Bancroft history prize that had been awarded to Bellisiles for "Arming America".

3. On January 8, 2003 the Associated Press reported that Knopf had decided to stop selling the Bellesiles book and to end its contractual relationship.

http://hnn.us/articles/691.html
 
I think Arming America should be in every library. It just needs to be moved to the fiction section.
 
Still, library board members held fast to the idea that public libraries are designed to provide a broad range of materials that readers can choose from, even if some deem them offensive.

Have you tested the bounds of this policy?

Try donating a copy of Unintended Consequences and Travis McGee's Enemies, Foreign and Domestic to see if they maintain the same stance.

But then, they will probably end up like Nugent’s cook book. “I’m sorry sir. That book must have been misplaced or stolen.â€
 
Last edited:
Putting it in the fiction section is okay, except as people start to read it they'll probably forget in which section it was located. Or the average mindless citizen won't even recognize the opposing facts that this is a research book and it was in the fiction section.

A better plan is to take a field trip to the library and correct their copy with a red pen. All the original text will be there, but the innocent reader won't be deluded into believing that the book's content is uncriticized.

Upon further reflection, this plan isn't very good because it's quite a lengthy project. A better idea would be to print out various sections of www.guncite.com, rip out the pages of the book, and insert the printouts. Gluing them to the spine is optional but recommended.
 
Just move the book over a few shelves, to the very bottom, between never-touched books that are about the same size, and have the first letters.

That's how you make a book disappear in a library. "POOF" it's gone.

snakelogo.jpg
 
No problem, Justin. :) I guess it wasn't the best thing to say.

I fix.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top