Tony Mig
Member
I'm well aware this pistol has it's many detractors, but there are those who appreciate it as well. Please don't turn this into a Beretta bash-a-thon, or offer an endless list of "better" choices as I'm looking for educated and well informed information regarding this model firearm.....Thank You
I have had past experience with a Beretta 96FS, I loved the gun, but didn't care for the .40 S&W round. I'am presently shopping for a new 9mm, and I've been looking at the Beretta...(as well as a few others)....but knowing how the gun feels in my hand, and how it functions, although in a gun of a different caliber, the over all size and feel are the same.
I see in Beretta's online catalog that they now offer a newer model 92A1 with a few upgrades, I'm not particularly interested in the front accessory rail, but more concerned with the internal improvements made, and if they make this pistol more reliable, or more accurate, and if these improvements warrant the extra cost.....?
One of the bonus' I see up front with the 92A1 is that it comes with 3 magazines in the box, since Beretta emphasizes this fact, I assume the 92FS only comes with 1 magazine....?
Does the added mass...(accessory rail).... on the front of the 92A1's frame make it harder to find good fitting holsters, or does the gun fit well in holsters made for the 92FS.....?
I'm hoping to hear from others who appreciate this pistol, and can offer any information regarding either model......thank you
I have had past experience with a Beretta 96FS, I loved the gun, but didn't care for the .40 S&W round. I'am presently shopping for a new 9mm, and I've been looking at the Beretta...(as well as a few others)....but knowing how the gun feels in my hand, and how it functions, although in a gun of a different caliber, the over all size and feel are the same.
I see in Beretta's online catalog that they now offer a newer model 92A1 with a few upgrades, I'm not particularly interested in the front accessory rail, but more concerned with the internal improvements made, and if they make this pistol more reliable, or more accurate, and if these improvements warrant the extra cost.....?
One of the bonus' I see up front with the 92A1 is that it comes with 3 magazines in the box, since Beretta emphasizes this fact, I assume the 92FS only comes with 1 magazine....?
Does the added mass...(accessory rail).... on the front of the 92A1's frame make it harder to find good fitting holsters, or does the gun fit well in holsters made for the 92FS.....?
I'm hoping to hear from others who appreciate this pistol, and can offer any information regarding either model......thank you