I had a real problem with Culbertson's "13 Cent Killers", anyone who would denigrate other snipers, especially Carlos Hathcock, the way he does.....
So did I. I have not yet finished 13cent killers (it's been on teh shelf adn partially read for about a year now, i don't know when or if i will pick it up again)
his first two books were of a totally different tone (at least in my mind). adn that's the form i thought that "13.C.K" would continue. but instead he started in on a trip about how "only those who went through the OFFICAL coures have ANY right to be called a sniper" and so on and so forth. all boiled down to him trying to make himself seem better than a Marine corps Legend.
For those who don't know, even though he's acknowledged as one of the founding members of the current USMC school for it, Hathcock never went THROUGH the course to become a scout/sniper.
his marksmanship and fieldcraft were already at a point, through his time on the Marine shooting team and innate skill, that it would have been wasteful to NOT simply say "ok Sgt, here's a rifle, what else do you need?".
Culbertson probably also holds a grudge b/c the book that "made hathcock famous"
Marine Sniper: 93 Kills "fudges" the truth in places as to who did what, and makes it seem as if Hathcock was a superman, or some sort of "sniper god".
I could go on and on on the subject so i'll shut up now before i get TOTALLY obsessed with it...
(maybe my wife is right and i am OCD)
regardless of the reasonings behind his dismissal of Hathcock and others as "not REAL snipers". culbertson really messed up by giving into the temptation to spout off on the subject. what COULD have been a truly enlightening book turned to a belittlement session.