I recently picked up my C model with the QAS sights. Here's a few thoughts on it.
- I like the trigger a lot more than my G26. It has a better, crisper feel to it. The trigger seemed to be on par of the PPQ.
- I dont care for their implementation of the mag release. The tang sticking out on the mags could be an issue in doing a reload in a hurry, catch on something, etc. It just doesnt seem like a good idea.
- The QAS were a PITA to get sighted in. Given the very short radius, it doesnt take much of a drift change on the front sight to make a BIG impact difference on the target.
- The QAS also makes accuracy a little more difficult (to me at least). Due to the short sight radius, a less that perfect grip/sight alignment/trigger pull would result in errant shot placement. After about 100 rnds, I was starting to get used to the sights, and at 7 yrds could get a nice tight gouping.
- For CC and defensive use, the QAS might be a good idea. If you plan on using one for the range, go with the conventional sights.
- Overall fit, feel, and finish is very nice. For the price ($460 OTD) it would make a nice truck or tool box gun. It's a little bigger (barrel length and grip length) than the G26, so take that into consideration for CC.
I would have no problem CC the Caracal, but I'll still CC my Kimber Tactical Ultra II. However, the Caracal is a nice addition to the stable.
If anyone is interested, I can take some pics of the Caracal C and G26 side-by-side tonight.
- I like the trigger a lot more than my G26. It has a better, crisper feel to it. The trigger seemed to be on par of the PPQ.
- I dont care for their implementation of the mag release. The tang sticking out on the mags could be an issue in doing a reload in a hurry, catch on something, etc. It just doesnt seem like a good idea.
- The QAS were a PITA to get sighted in. Given the very short radius, it doesnt take much of a drift change on the front sight to make a BIG impact difference on the target.
- The QAS also makes accuracy a little more difficult (to me at least). Due to the short sight radius, a less that perfect grip/sight alignment/trigger pull would result in errant shot placement. After about 100 rnds, I was starting to get used to the sights, and at 7 yrds could get a nice tight gouping.
- For CC and defensive use, the QAS might be a good idea. If you plan on using one for the range, go with the conventional sights.
- Overall fit, feel, and finish is very nice. For the price ($460 OTD) it would make a nice truck or tool box gun. It's a little bigger (barrel length and grip length) than the G26, so take that into consideration for CC.
I would have no problem CC the Caracal, but I'll still CC my Kimber Tactical Ultra II. However, the Caracal is a nice addition to the stable.
If anyone is interested, I can take some pics of the Caracal C and G26 side-by-side tonight.