Loosedhorse
member
It is absolutely true that most church "security" needs would involve theft, vandalism, and other non-violent crimes. But I can understand if the focus is less on things that insurance can cover, and more on unlikely lethal threats that must be prevented or stopped.
By all means invite the CLEO, maybe the Fire chief, too. They will have ideas. If folks in the congregation are planning on being armed, not bad that these folks know that if an emergency comes up.
The keys will always be the same: minimum access (all doors locked except those mandated open by fire code), and eyes on those open doors. Cell phones. What to do about the security of folks alone in the building (when locking up, cleaning, or opening up), and of children.
It's quite a project, and it won't be perfect, but something is far better than nothing. And, yes, it would be silly not to have plans in place for fire and medical emergencies--anything where lives are on the line.
By all means invite the CLEO, maybe the Fire chief, too. They will have ideas. If folks in the congregation are planning on being armed, not bad that these folks know that if an emergency comes up.
The keys will always be the same: minimum access (all doors locked except those mandated open by fire code), and eyes on those open doors. Cell phones. What to do about the security of folks alone in the building (when locking up, cleaning, or opening up), and of children.
It's quite a project, and it won't be perfect, but something is far better than nothing. And, yes, it would be silly not to have plans in place for fire and medical emergencies--anything where lives are on the line.