Colt rimfire .22 AR-15

Status
Not open for further replies.

hatchetbearer

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
479
Location
SE Ohio,Yuma, Arizona
I've been looking at those Colt/Umarex carbines in .22lr, and it got me wondering if these rifles are made of pot metal and can only handle .22's or are they regular lowers that just have .22 stamped on them letting me swap out with a 5.56 upper and have an m4gery, and a dedicated .22 upper?


Price is low enough, im considering one of these instead of building my own. And having a colt stamped lower makes good trade fodder as well
 
You say pot metal, they say "die cast zinc alloy". Should be OK as long as you can't put a normal upper on it.

After seeing these I opted to spend a bit more and get a Spike's Tactical dedicated .22 upper which works on any standard lower.

--wally.
 
' die cast zinc alloy' also what Jimenez arms, and other mouse guns are made of; classic pot metal... Not that it won't work with your ar, but I could see the holes getting routed out a bit, if used roughly, other than bench or hunting usage.
 
I wouldn't buy one.

S&W went with poly for theirs, I believe. I'd be much, much more inclined to that rather than pot metal. Countless guns have proven themselves with poly, from the Nylon 66 to the modern poly pistols. On the other hand, very, very few "pot metal" guns are worth a damn.

One of the better reasons I have heard for getting a dedicated .22 rifle like the Colt or S&W offerings is that even dedicated uppers have reliability issues for many people.
 
still too new and not enough review out there. looks very promising but for the money (if you plan on shooting .223/5.56) i'd get a quality ar15 and a .22lr conversion.
 
I'll keep posting it in each of these threads that comes up, I guess. The two Colts I've handled were garbage. Poor fit and finish. Wonky controls. One would not close the bolt or release the charging handle right out of the box, the other would fire a few rounds and the bolt would stick half open. The telescoping stock wobbled at least an inch in all directions and was completely useless on both.

These were very early runs however; they may be worth looking at again in the future.

I can personally vouch for the GSG-5 and the GSG AK-47 (at least the wood, have not held a synthetic.) They're great. The best thing you can buy for $500? No. A riot to shoot? Absolutely.

I'm keen to try the S&W MP15-22's, but have not gotten my hands on one yet. Maybe still have a few in stock when I go to my dealer in the next few days to pick up the GSG Ak-47 he ordered. But the reviews I've heard from everybody else has been solidly positive.

One thing to note - A lot of guys like to ride their thumbs all the way down on the spring in the magazine to load faster and easier - Don't. Load them one at a time. You can put a little pressure on the spring with each round to make it go faster, but they're finicky about how they're fed in there. I'd bet most of the FTF problems people have with their GSGs are related to this. In the S&W, they use a semi-double stack design, and it will be even more prone to loading them like this. Load them one at a time, use decent ammo.

And, as others have said, the Colt, the S&W, the SIG 522, etc, are all dedicated .22 platforms. You cannot exchange uppers or lowers on them. You can do most other mods on them, though (stocks, grips, rails, etc)

If your goal is a .22 you can convert to .223, get a complete lower and a Spike's Tactical .22LR upper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top