Compressed loads

Status
Not open for further replies.

sappyg

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
1,439
Location
South Carolina
Just loaded 20 rounds of 223 using IMR 4895 and a 65 gr. Sierra GK BT in PPU brass. Had some compression but the bullet seated to the desired depth. The charge weight is below listed max for a 63 grainer but I couldn't find specific data for the 65 gr. bullet

What are the issues with compressed load? I take it they are GTG as they are sometimes listed in manuals with some powders and bullets. But, on the other hand, I'd rather be safe than sorry. Should I pull these and start over?
 
First question is, did you workup to that load? If not, you really need to do a proper workup that way you can make sure those are going to be safe in your rifle.

Saying that though, I love compressed loads. No movement of powder. I mean it's there. Lol. I actually have a match load that I use that is a compressed load of IMR 4064.
 
Don't pull anything...........not a problem, go ahead. Load, shoot, enjoy.

Compressed loads are the norm with certain bulky powders.
 
Without knowing your actual load it's impossible to know if your load is safe or not.

As for compression, if there is load data to support the charge you will be GTG as long as you work up.

Compressing powder is very common and desired by many, even heavily compressed loads.
 
Depending on the degree of compression the powder can "push back" and push the OAL longer over time. I've never seen this happen so I wouldn't worry about it as long as you have good neck tension. Just something to keep in the back of your mind.
 
Some powders work well when compressed and some don't like to be compressed at all. If there are published recipes showing a compressed load with a powder, and you are under max, one should be GTG. If there is no published info on a compressed load with a powder, I would contact the powder manufacturer/supplier and see if compressed loads are safe. There are published loads for compressed loads using 4895. Use your own judgement.
 
I think everyone covered this quite well, but to reiterate some of this, when a particular recipe designates compression, all is good.

OTOH, if your experiencing a compressed charge and no such designation is made, there are a few possibles that need verification.

1. Check your data, verify that the specifics of the load are correct, bullet weight and the powder being used are consistent with compression.

2. Make sure your scale or measure is throwing the designated and desired charge published.

3. Sometimes it is possible for heavier brass to create a compressed charge, this can often result in higher pressures when compression isn't designated within the published data, or at that place in the charge table.

The only reason I am addressing these specifics is because I witnessed a major catastrophic event the result of a new reloader who misconstrued the conditions that justify and support a compressed charge. In short, this fellow some how thought that a compressed charge was acceptable as a general condition with any powder, thus an extreme over charge was the result. He was pretty badly burned and bruised up, and his very nice and expensive Weatherby was completely destroyed. The root cause was that this reloader took published information completely out of context at every level, therefore he failed to use the published data for the powder / cartridge / and bullet he was loading with.

But all that aside, published compressed charges are perfectly safe, and often produce very consistent loads, at least in my experience.

GS
 
Last edited:
As long as you are within the properly published data, you are good to go....compressed loads are nothing to be worried about. It's all about powder fluffiness (scientific, yes I know) .......let 'er rip potato chip!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top