Pistol Toter
Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2005
- Messages
- 657
Yeah, I watch it fairly regular. It's a good comedy! Reminds me of the Keystone Cops, and Charlie Chapman; real slapstick. :banghead:
Mr_Moore said:Not to mention underpaid. I had an uncle who retired as a Lieutenant. He made an OK paycheck, but not nearly enough to compensate for the BS/danger he had to put up with.
I vote that all cops get a 100% raise immediatly. (I'll even pay the extra taxes to pay for it)
Mr_Moore said:I like for my kids to watch Cops. I think they can learn a lot about crime and what to avoid, like drunk driving when they get older. (My adult children already know about that one)
I believe you're referring to Sheriff John Bunnell.ka50 said:The scumbag commentator [of Wildest Police Videos] used to be a LEO too... I wanted to find his email to write him what I think of him, but he's not listed anywhere.
I remember a simular episode. The suspect was actually pretty cooperative.Arkie said:I think the best one I like is when a police officer pulled over a drunk driver and while talking to him the officer asked him if he smokes dope. The guy told the officer that he would never touch the stuff and all he does is drink beer.
Then if you looked at the drunks guys ear, behind it was a neatly rolled up joint just waiting to be lit up. LOL...
The officer pulled it out from behind his ear and the guy kept telling him that it wasn't his.
hammer4nc said:"COPS" pretty well chronicles the devolution of current law enforcement, and its preoccupation with drugs...examples:
> Cops choking some guy out to recover "evidence"; usually a few rocks...high fives all around after this successful le operation.
> Coordinated "buy-busts", where the (usually junior) cop on the takedown squad is responsible for seizing the property. When the guy is arrested for buying a dime from the uc, the first question asked is: "Do you own this car?"...the podunk pd has to fund their new night vision equipment, don't they? Recall one young high school girl whose Camaro was a gift from her grandmother..."well we're going to own it now!!" >>Good bust; high fives. LE depts. benefitting financially from arrests is a cancer that is spreading.
Nowadays, it has become common practice for cops to break the law; to enforce the law. Everyone should read judge Napolitano's book on this topic.
Example: UC cops selling dope on the street (from the evidence locker). Our law-and-order members here will quote chapter and verse on the current "entrapment" philosophy (suspect was predisposed to commit the crime, so no violation..nudge, wink). For the members who say: cops have to abide by the same laws as everyone else...how come the cop-uc-dealer isn't also arrested for dealing dope? In general, drug warriors have embraced deception wholeheartedly, the ends justify the means. And they expect everyone to believe that this attitude doesn't bleed over to sworn testimony, in order to take down the (in their mind guilty) pos dirtbag (using the most common parlance from glocktalk/coptalk). Human nature, I guess.
For those ready to flame me for bashing, please first make a convincing argument that citizen trust and respect for le is getting better; while laws bcome more intrusive, and cops in general start looking more like isolated soldiers in a hostile environment.
Pointing out the corrupting influence that asset forfeiture prior to conviction has on law enforcement hardly constitutes "cop-bashing".Leave it to someone to turn a thread about a tv show into cop-bashing
That is already the frame of mind *I* have with respect to the police. They serve as record takers and filers of documents that the courts and insurance companies require, nothing more.Please call your local PD and tell them that since they are all law breakers and criminals that you no longer want their assistance in any future incidents that may arrise.
Well no, looks as though the cop-bashing started about seven posts before that one ...Pointing out the corrupting influence that asset forfeiture prior to conviction has on law enforcement hardly constitutes "cop-bashing".
I agree with that, for sure. Funny though, one of the last episodes I caught was with some of our local boys (Pierce County, WA SO), a guy and his girlfriend were being hassled, but the suspect complained the guy had a gun ... the officers simply had the guy show where he was packing (a fanny pack) and glanced at his CPL, and he was good to go. Contrast that with an episode depicting (IIRC) Boston PD and a little potmetal .32 or .380 they pulled out of a car; those boys acted as though they'd just captured Bin Laden carrying an M-60 ... (then the officer couldn't even figure out how to clear the pistol, think it was a Davis or a Lorcin) ...It's also a bit disturbing to see the attitudes of many big-city cops, esp. back east, to firearms
Now, to quote Sin LaSalle in the movie "Be Cool": "Must you play into the stereotypes?"Leave it to someone to turn a thread about a tv show into cop-bashing
What does all this have to do with a discussion about a television show?I was more hoping for some discussion re:
A defense of asset/forfeiture funding local departments (esp. sans conviction). You think its a good thing, I take it?
Discussion of the war on drugs, how use of deception ENHANCES citizen respect for law enforcement, and/or how it could never adversely affect sworn testimony or written affadavits. Breaking the law to enforce the law is a good thing?
Heck, I'd even settle for some discussion of how cops never eat at fast food joints because they're afraid of phlegm condiments added without request; how this is a reflection of good citizen relations.
Seems to me you could just as easily start threads dedicated to those topics rather than work in all your negative viewpoints of law enforcement into a thread that really is just about the TV program ...