There have been more than a few cases where someone was charged with a NFA suppressor violation for sticking a
potato on the end of a gun. Here's one:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
US man faces 25 years in jail for using potato as silencer
A US man who wielded a gun with a potato stuffed in the barrel has been convicted of using a silencer-equipped gun in the commission of a drug crime.
The conviction carries a mandatory 25-year federal prison sentence.
The prosecutor said the potato wasn't in the gun to make French fries, but to intimidate three women.
The defendant, Alpha McQueen, 30, was also convicted in Hartford, Connecticut of conspiracy to distribute marijuana.
Prosecutors said McQueen and another man, Dale Stewart, used the gun to intimidate three women they suspected of stealing about $30,000 in drug money. No shots were fired.
Under a deal that spared him from the silencer charge, Stewart pleaded guilty last month to drug and gun charges carrying a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years.
McQueen was offered the same deal, but opted to go to trial.
In closing arguments, federal prosecutors said no expert testimony was necessary to establish the significance of affixing a potato to the gun's barrel.
Prosecutor David A. Ring said: "It wasn't there to make French fries. Why else would he have done that?"
Defence attorney David Wenc said he planned to appeal.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I didn't do a google search, but I believe some have been charged with NFA suppressor violations for using a pillow to quiet a weapon, also.
There really does not have to be any logical reasoning behind it...in the invertebrate world of federal law enforcement,
anything that produces greater add-on sentences is a
good thing, and there are quite a few cheerleaders around to loudly proclaim what wonderful detective work produced the charges. After all, the ends justify the means, right?