DC announces 'Guns Aside' month

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone remember the public school (New Yuck I think) where they handed out Lance Armstrong style cause bracelets showing support for an end to bullying?

First, can anyone tell me why this is a DUMB :cuss:ING IDEA without reading any further?

The people that wore them were targeted by the local bullies and beaten up until they no longer wore the bracelets and morale failed. This seems like a non-sandboxed version of that plan, and I worry for the people who sign up.

OTOH, would CCWing while wearing one count as hunting over a bait pile? :evil:
 
Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya
Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya
Oh Lord, Kumbaya

I'd like to buy the world a home and furnish it with love,
Grow apple trees and honey bees, and snow white turtle doves.
I'd like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony,
I'd like to buy the world a Coke and keep it company.

:rolleyes:
 
Preacherman said:
But I always have a gun at my side... :confused:

Oh - sorry, misinterpreted their idea.

:D


No, you have it wrong, it's "A gun a-side month". They want to encourage us to have a gun on each side of us. :D
 
I work in the district ..... after a while you become uncaring, immune or apathetic to the moronic nonsense that the elected officials and dc metro police leadership spout. You would not believe the things that the dc metro cop leadership and the dc city council say. And believe it or not, the socialist element eat it up and repeat it as gospel.

This latest stupidity does not suprise me......

Yes, chief ramsey..... I'm sure that the good criminals will not rob/hurt/molest me if I wear this bracelet. The guy needs a clue... Anyone know where he can rent one to use?
 
John Hicks said:
No, you have it wrong, it's "A gun a-side month". They want to encourage us to have a gun on each side of us. :D


it seems to me there is way too much confusion about the intentions of this 'initiative'. do they want residents to carry one gun or two? if it's only one, does it matter which side of the body it's carried on? should it be a specific caliber? i want this thing to go off with a bang:evil: .........so i've prepared the following editorial piece for submission to washington d.c.'s chief of police:


dear sir,

i am so excited about your "guns aside", responsible firearm ownership initiative. there's no better way to tell the criminals to "give us back our streets", than a responsible show of force. if i could afford to purchase a handgun for every peace-loving citizen of your city, i would.....in a heartbeat. what a deterent to crime it would be......hundreds of thousands of patriots in our capital city, exercising their constitutional right to bear arms and protect themselves and their communities. i myself do not live in your fair city, but i have many friends that do. i want to do my part to encourage their participation in this bold program, but i'm afraid i am confused about a number of details that i'm hoping you can clarify for me. firstly, which 'side' of the body are you recommending people carry their guns on? i was always under the impression that it was a matter of preference for the gun owner, and largely dependent on which hand was predominant. is there some new legislation or guidance in place regarding this that i am unfamiliar with? secondly, do you recommend that people carry more than one firearm in public? practically, i know it makes more sense to not over burden oneself, but maybe special considerations are being made specifically for this initiative. lastly, will there be a parade scheduled? a large gathering on the mall perhaps? so many fine causes have been championed by millions coming together on the mall, why not another?

again, i cannot praise you enough for doing what you can to promote and preserve our right to bear arms. in a time when so many are doing their best to disarm law-abiding citizens, leaving them as helpless prey for increasingly numerous and violent criminals, it's good to see enlightened communities with leaders that haven't completely lost their minds. can you believe sir, that in one city, they sought to promote an initiative where citizens, many of them young children, were encouraged to wear bracelets that virtually identified them as being unarmed? the authorities may as well have printed t-shirts that said "please rob, rape and murder me, as i am unarmed, and delusional enough to think that you criminals will be participating in this initiative as well." unbelievable. Thank YOU sir for being one of the level headed. your sensibility and understanding of troubled, crime-ridden communities, and how best to address their problems is a shining example. thank you, and thank you again.
 
Why don't we have a "cars aside" day as a result of an increased number of automotive deaths? After all, there are far more deaths due to vehicle accidents than firearms. :barf:
 
I will never understand why liberals can't apply their own logic to the crime problem.


AIDS problem hand out clean needles so the druggies don't spread AIDS.


Preggers problem hand out condoms and if you still have a problem there's always abortion.

Crime problem hand out loaded guns and if you still have a problem well there's always abortion by JHP.

As a matter fact why don't we call self defense shooting abortions or attempted abortions then we might not have so much gun control
 
Kodiaz said:
I will never understand why liberals can't apply their own logic to the crime problem.

AIDS problem hand out clean needles so the druggies don't spread AIDS.

Preggers problem hand out condoms and if you still have a problem there's always abortion.

Crime problem hand out loaded guns and if you still have a problem well there's always abortion by JHP.

I was about to tear into you for liberal bashing, and then I realized that this actually sounds like a good idea. :neener:
 
They want you to give up your guns, because guns make you tempted to disobey your betters.

"Back to your toils, serfs! Obey!"

If you would just be good sheep, the fleecing could proceed uneventfully.
 
carlrodd said:
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!! SERIOUSLY....

the knuckleheaded representatives and heads of local law enforcement that miss the point then beat their chests and lament the loss of another innocent to evil scurge of handguns, and begin planning the next anti-gun program, instead of throwing their effort and resources into tracking down and punishing the criminals who use them, and addressing the domestic concerns that create an environment in communities that nurtures hate, greed and violence.

It is so simple and cost effective to focus on the gun ... it is easy to see, to equate to violence and hold up as a killer ... it is a lot more difficult, and costly, to identify an individual, try him/her and incarcerate ... the longer held, the more costly.

Anyone for return of "Road gangs" (ala "Coolhand Luke"), forced labor for public works projects ... ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top