I've heard a rumor that the U.S. military has let a contract to a local gunshop to demil M14s by disassembly and then shipping the receivers back, presumably for destruction. Anyone heard of this also?
I've heard a rumor that the U.S. military has let a contract to a local gunshop to demil M14s by disassembly and then shipping the receivers back, presumably for destruction. Anyone heard of this also?
I saw several M-14 marked receivers built up into semi M1A's at the recent Birmingham, AL gunshow. I posted a question on this board about the "once a machine gun always a machine gun rule" that was rumored to have been changed. Everyone here seemed to think it was not true, but how then do you explain all the M-14's? These are U.S. marked M-14 receivers with "special" documentation that showed they were rebuilt into legal guns.
By the way, has anyone seen the newest SOCOM version?
A local shop owner has told a friend of mine he has signed the paperwork for a contract to demil 700 M14s. He'll keep the parts, send the receivers back, and be paid a nominal amount for each rifle disassembled. He'll sell the parts as "kits" to make his money. He has committed to selling one of the kits to my friend.
The M-14's I saw had missing selector switches, gov stamps, and atf letter (which I didn't see but was told it came with one). These were not some semi-auto receivers with M-14 markings. (give me some credit) These were M-14's at some point. I didn't check to see if they were rewelds. Even if they were rewelds, how is that not in violation of "once machine gun always machine gun rule"? I think the rule is stupid anyway and I hope it is changed.
Well, it wasn't U of Minn. ROTC c.1981. We had to borrow M16A1's from the 205 Inf. Bde. , and our D&C weapons were Garands.m-14s were permanently de-auto'd, and released into the CMP (or was it ROTC?)