Does anyone dabble in saps or blackjacks?

Status
Not open for further replies.
DO NOT confuse reason with the actions of legislatures.

DO NOT confuse dictionary, popular, or your own definitions of a word with the intent of the law and the use of a word by the law.

If you have a question about whether these or any other device are legal or not for carry, look it up in the statutes of your state and federal law and any other governing body you live under.

Besidesides my comments about the personal protection course earlier I also had a setion in Florida Law for Police when I was getting my AA with centralization in Law Enforcement at a Florida COmmunity COllege that meantioned illegal weapons and there they were. The class was taught by the area's assistant states attourney that would be prosicuting such violations. Then it was covered in a class on Issues in Modern Law Enforcement when I was getting my BS in Criminology at FSU.

There were examples of saps and blackjacks on a board of illegal weapons at the Law Enforcement training academy "North" near Tallahassee at one point.

If you would like to explain to an Florida LEO and to a Florida judge what makes you special and what makes you an expert on what "really" is a slung shot or not.....don't say you weren't warned.

-kBob


I agree with what you're saying about knowing the law and not trusting an off the cuff analysis.
 
Every now and then this same topic shows up and folks provide their opinions. I still own the two contact weapons that I carried on the street years ago. One is flat slapper, well shaped from where it rested in my back pocket and got sat on a whole lot more than anything else - the other a spring loaded black jack.

Two thoughts about these kind of weapons. The first is that anyone using one in a conflict risks a felony conviction.... The second is that the few times I personally used one it only raised the level of conflict (the folks I dealt with got very, very angry if hit by one). If you actually do hit someone to take them down hard you really do risk killilng them.... Down here in paradise the first annual MacDuffy riots were a direct result of someone being beaten into submission -that subsequently died from his injuries to the head area... machined metal flashlights were used in the MacDuffy case but the principle is the same......

I quit carrying them when I learned better tactics and developed the kind of self confidence that only comes from few years in police work. I also had more than a few encounters with folks that had to be physically subdued since the only other recourse would have been to do them such serious injury that you risked killing them. Here I'm talking about crazy or terribly intoxicated aggressive individuals that it might take a few officers to subdue... You haven't lived until you see someone hit in the head with a full stroke by a baton or blackjack and not only are they still standing but they want to get up close and personal as they object to being hit....

Collect them if you will. Carry or use one and you're getting into very dangerous territory unless you're defending your home from forcible entry....
 
Metal flash lights and batons swung by amped up multiple officers certainly can be deadly and not advisable.
Back in the less amped up officer days, and when my Uncle was an NYPD Gold Shield dick the beavertail sap was usually applied with a moderate and experentially aimed blow with the flat aimed at the lower back of head, if possible , and delivered by surprise surreptitiously ! If tht didn't work and things got combative it was aimed full force where ever you could get a hit, like ,elbows forearms, groin, face ect. The jack is much more effective for non head hits BTW and was carried for those that preferred such tactics.
I don't carry a sap anymore. The penalties for a slip up with a .45 are less in this state so it is a no brainer for me.
 
Last edited:
As an aside, I see that the most recent issue of tac knives (march2013!) has a brief article on saps, as well as the custom coin purse variation, FWIW.

The article does go on to mention the temple (!) as one of the preferred target locations, which strikes me (no pun intended) as dangerously close to recklessly irresponsible, but it's worth a quick look if you find yourself killing time inside a borders or barnes & noble on black Friday...
 
Totally agree Owen.

As to whether or not to hit the head, or if it's irresponsible... I feel that's kind of a situational question. It's no more irresponsible to whack someone in the head than shoot them in a given situation. The tactics are determined by the situation, and in some situations, the sap or another impact weapon employed as lethal force can make more sense than the gun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top