peep
Member
I’ve been thinking for some time about bias and ignorance that too often appears in news media concerning gun related stories. This is specifically concerning broadcast media. When TV stations air blatantly misleading or incorrect yarns (faked footage, etc.), what do you think about a concerted effort to have activist file complaint letters with the FCC with each offending TV station? Something like:
http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm?sid=d1e640&id=d1e697
Faked footage can be something like what happened with CNN as in
http://gunowners.org/op0333.htm
where the video crew had a sheriff fire a full auto machine gun and it was implied to the viewing audience that the 1994 “Assault Weapons” ban was to keep such weapons “off the streets.” Of course, that was a cable network but it can also happen with over-the-air broadcast.
A few weeks ago a local TV station aired a short piece about the possibility of a similar ban and danged if they didn’t show a burst from a full auto M16 (again, more misdirection). I didn’t see the whole piece, and didn’t call them on it because of other time consuming issues. We live in a rather pro gun area so I hope some other people did.
I don’t know how much of this kind of journalism is intentional. I’m sure some of it is because of ignorance and/or laziness. It really doesn’t matter though because it will be very damaging if another AWB is attempted.
I’ve called and written local stations to give a point-by-point critique of bad reporting before. Maybe filing FCC complaints isn’t nice but neither is trying to squash the Second Amendment. I think it will really irritate the network affiliates who will probably give the network an ear-full for producing the program and causing the problem. Maybe this would also work to get some of the news gathering agencies to clean up their act?
http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm?sid=d1e640&id=d1e697
Faked footage can be something like what happened with CNN as in
http://gunowners.org/op0333.htm
where the video crew had a sheriff fire a full auto machine gun and it was implied to the viewing audience that the 1994 “Assault Weapons” ban was to keep such weapons “off the streets.” Of course, that was a cable network but it can also happen with over-the-air broadcast.
A few weeks ago a local TV station aired a short piece about the possibility of a similar ban and danged if they didn’t show a burst from a full auto M16 (again, more misdirection). I didn’t see the whole piece, and didn’t call them on it because of other time consuming issues. We live in a rather pro gun area so I hope some other people did.
I don’t know how much of this kind of journalism is intentional. I’m sure some of it is because of ignorance and/or laziness. It really doesn’t matter though because it will be very damaging if another AWB is attempted.
I’ve called and written local stations to give a point-by-point critique of bad reporting before. Maybe filing FCC complaints isn’t nice but neither is trying to squash the Second Amendment. I think it will really irritate the network affiliates who will probably give the network an ear-full for producing the program and causing the problem. Maybe this would also work to get some of the news gathering agencies to clean up their act?