cbsbyte
Member
Which part of "has a hope in hell" did you miss?
The latest polls have him between 2 & 6%.
Well that is still 1-5% more than Ron Paul.
Which part of "has a hope in hell" did you miss?
The latest polls have him between 2 & 6%.
Since when is pointing out a voting record slander? He voted against freedom. He came back later and wrote letters of support against freedom.
Fred Thompson is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. This extremely important and powerful insider Establishment foreign policy and media think tank has long been linked to internationalism, global government, the New World Order, etc.
Since when is pointing out a voting record slander? He voted against freedom. He came back later and wrote letters of support against freedom.
Maybe, he had Alzeheimers real bad by 2001. But if he were still healthy I really doubt it.
FEMA, whose main role is disaster response, is also responsible for handling US domestic unrest.
From 1982-84 Colonel Oliver North assisted FEMA in drafting its civil defence preparations. Details of these plans emerged during the 1987 Iran-Contra scandal.
They included executive orders providing for suspension of the constitution, the imposition of martial law, internment camps, and the turning over of government to the president and FEMA.
A Miami Herald article on July 5, 1987, reported that the former FEMA director Louis Guiffrida's deputy, John Brinkerhoff, handled the martial law portion of the planning. The plan was said to be similar to one Mr Giuffrida had developed earlier to combat "a national uprising by black militants". It provided for the detention "of at least 21million American Negroes"' in "assembly centres or relocation camps".
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/27/1027497418339.html
Well that is still 1-5% more than Ron Paul.
I’m really sick of the defeatist “he can’t win” attitude about Ron Paul. Anyone can win if people vote for him and Dr. Paul has an appeal that crosses party lines, we just need to get him the nomination. If “electability” is a consideration in your choice at all you’re the one throwing away your vote. I hope that for the first time in decades people are principled enough to vote for their idea of the best candidate without letting the mainstream media dictate your choice. In the words of Rammstein, “Let me hear you make decisions, without your television.” If you like Fred Thompson great, but don’t vote for him because you think he has a better chance. It’s time we stop “playing” politics.
I'm a rather staunch Libertarian Party voter who seldom
votes for a contender from another party in a partisan race where an LP candidate is
running (Tom McClintock is a rare exception to my rule). Even if I really like the
(normally) GOP candidate, usually the gerrymandering or the polled popular will make
clear that my vote is meaningless as to the outcome of the contest, so I vote for my
Libertarian representative, knowing my vote shows my preference but will not affect
the outcome of the race.
As you probably surmised, I'm supporting GOP Congressman Ron Paul in his admittedly
long-shot run at President. IF he wins the GOP nomination, I'll support Dr. Paul
over whoever the LP runs as its standard bearer.
Sadly, I need not worry about this potential conflict in the national election. Ron
Paul will not win the Republican Party nomination. He's too far removed from the
mainstream of his declining party. Would that the GOP electorate would prove me
wrong!
Still, to the extent he gets into the GOP debates, primaries and the press, Ron Paul
is doing wonders for disseminating the (today) radical concept of limited,
constitutional government. As the cliché says, it's a "win-win" situation for us
Libertarians.
Hence I see no conflict in Libertarians enthusiastically supporting Dr. Paul in is
quixotic quest -- if for no other reason than it drives his party leaders and the
press to distraction. We'll still have the opportunity to support our LP
presidential race sacrificial lamb come the general election.
That's my opinion, but I realize it's only an opinion.I'm voting for Fred Thompson. He is as close to Reagan as we will likely see in my lifetime.
So a TV show is more important than service to the Country?Timing is due to Law and Order. He has a contract with them. If he announces now, they will not be allowed to air any episode with him in it. After the season is over, he will announce. Next week?
So a TV show is more important than service to the Country?
his foreign policy ideas are a recipe for disaster
How soon we forget.
When president Ronald Reagan was considering invading Nicaragua, he issued a series of executive orders that provided the Federal Emergency Management Agency with broad powers in the event of a crisis such as violent and widespread internal dissent or national opposition against a U.S. military invasion abroad.
That is a bunch of BS. Why don't you post the whole article? Why don't you post a real resource?
So a TV show is more important than service to the Country?