"Free State Project"

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
http://reason.com/0301/ci.jw.operation.shtml

Operation Free State

Moving for social change
By Jesse Walker



If you’d like to put some political ideas into practice, you’ve got several options. One is to convince your neighbors to vote your notions into law. Another is to find some like-minded ideologues and start a new community from scratch.

And then there’s Jason Sorens’ plan, which combines the first two approaches: Find people who agree with you, move en masse to a designated place, and then start voting. Sorens, a libertarian graduate student at Yale, is the founder of the Free State Project.

"Our research so far," the project’s Web site declares, "indicates that 20,000 activists could heavily influence only states with under about 1.5 million population, or which spend less than $10 million on political campaigns in any given two-year election cycle." Once other considerations -- "coastal access," "a decent job market," "a native culture that’s already pro-liberty" -- are taken into account, Sorens says, four potential targets stand out: Delaware, New Hampshire, Wyoming, and Alaska.

Sorens’ idea is not new to libertarian circles. In the late 1980s, for example, the Colorado activist Mary Margaret Glennie launched the Fort Collins Project, described in the now-defunct American Libertarian as "a five-year project to attract an initial one thousand libertarians to the Fort Collins area." (The effort failed, and Glennie later turned her attention to the prospect of libertarian space colonies.)

Sorens believes his group is taking a more scientific approach. The Fort Collins group, he notes, "didn’t research alternative options"; Glennie picked Fort Collins because that’s where she lived. In addition, Sorens will ask his supporters to make the move only after 20,000 people have signed on. That way, he hopes, no one will have to uproot himself without knowing whether others will follow.

Has anyone ever succeeded in taking over a community this way? In 1981 the guru Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh and his followers moved to the Big Muddy Ranch near Antelope, Oregon, with plans to transform their commune into an enormous resort. When the local government started giving them trouble, they registered to vote, took over the city council, and renamed Antelope the City of Rajneesh. Alas:

The group was later charged with a series of crimes, including vote fraud, and its guru was deported. Today, Antelope is once more known by its original name.

Then there’s the followers of the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, who settled in Fairfield, Iowa, in 1974. On July 25, 2001, they incorporated a new town nearby, dubbed Vedic City, which they have since declared the capital of a new Global Country of World Peace. Four months after Vedic City was born, a member of the Maharishi-linked Natural Law Party was elected mayor of Fairfield.

Sorens thinks the Free State Project can do better. "We have an advantage," he argues, "in that we aren’t a fringe religious group."


http://www.freestateproject.com

Edited to add above URL- check it out, it's an interesting site and idea:D
 
How many people would it take to reclaim The Peoples Democratic Republic of California?
 
I've been following FSP for a while. My wife isn't gung-ho on moving but then we just built a new log home(ourselves, 13 months of stupidi...erm, fun). But in 5 years, who knows. I'm really curious to see which state they pick.

I really wonder, though, if it isn't just forcing an eventual confrontation. How much government can they eliminate before the Fed starts cracking down, demanding enforcement of unfunded mandates and such.
 
I've been looking into it too. Like many people on these forums, I think our country will have to go through some pretty "interesting" times in the next few years. I keep guns around and practice with them in case things get too "interesting," but I hope I won't need them. The "Free State Project" might provide an alternative to armed confrontation.
 
I really, really like the idea of the Free State Project.
I'd like to think that it has a decent chance of success.

However, I think that the current economic climate gives the FSP a problem that it has to overcome:

People aren't as upwardly or laterally mobile as they were two years ago. I would have a hard time signing a document saying that I would move somewhere without the prospect of finding a good job there.

I really wish I could sign on, but pragmatism keeps me from doing it.:(
 
I remember when I went to boot camp, there was a picture of a graveyard on the wall in one of the classrooms. It was captioned "These men bunched." This little project reminds me of that photo for some odd reason.
 
I'm not an FSP signatory (my personal situation right now precludes me from signing a contract that I may not be able to uphold) but I am a supporter. I probably will move to the Free State when it is selected. I think I would really like Wyoming, even living out of my Honda...

Re: Bunching - This is a tactical consideration rather than a strategic one. In the macroscale, bunching makes a lot of sense for defense, shortening lines of supply, and providing a large core of supporters. I hope like hell that the freedom movement doesn't come to a fight, but if it does I'd sure like to have a powerbase to work from.

- Chris
 
In order to be a total free state one would have to succeed from the union. I am not willing at this time to be a part of that.
 
I've been an FSP member for several months now. I thinks it's far and away the best of very few choices. Me, I'll go where the FSP goes even if I have to get on Welfare to do it!

...

(Yes, I'm kidding :p. I hate the very idea of being on Welfare.)

2nd Amendment - If the FSP works, then yeah, it probably will eventually force a state-Fed confrontation. But something has to force that confrontation (be it judicial or violent) or else nothing will get any better for a long, long time.

Rock-jock - In the strict sense, the FSP is absolutely not a religious group (fringe or otherwise). Members include everything from athiests to devout mainstream Christians, and a variety of other less populous groups. If you want to look at whether freedom is a goal approaching religious proportions for FSP members, then you may be right (I can't speak for anyone else, but it likely is for me). However, being overtly pro-freedom doesn't carry the same stigma as endorsing a fringe religious belief (aka "cult"). So I think that even if we are "extreme," Jason Sorens is correct in that we don't have to overcome as many barriers as a religious order would.
 
What's wrong with you guys? NH is the free state, I've declared it so many months back, so what's with the hesitation?

It is easily the best state for it, as it serves not only for a good freedom-loving place on it's own merit, but it is also the perfect launching off point into two other states that are being considered (VT and ME). So c'mon over here with me and let's really get into high gear and kick some behind.

Golgo-13

Could this idea also be similar to the blitzkreig tactic of concentrating your force at your enemy's weak point?
 
What's wrong with you guys? NH is the free state, I've declared it so many months back, so what's with the hesitation?

It is easily the best state for it, as it serves not only for a good freedom-loving place on it's own merit, but it is also the perfect launching off point into two other states that are being considered (VT and ME). So c'mon over here with me and let's really get into high gear and kick some behind.

Golgo-13

Could this idea also be similar to the blitzkreig tactic of concentrating your force at your enemy's weak point?
 
If you want to look at whether freedom is a goal approaching religious proportions for FSP members, then you may be right (I can't speak for anyone else, but it likely is for me).
I admire your intellectual honesty. The fervency of the faith of some towards the ideal of liberty goes beyond that of a strongly held belief to that of an all-consuming passion which consumes most of their waking thought, dictates their life practices, political views, and philosophies, and ignites them with a zealotry that would make Paul the Apostle look wishy-washy. This qualifies as religion. Most would not admit it because they fancy themselves independent thinkers free from the reins of organized religion, but true it is nonetheless. I don't know if the FSP meets this definition or not.
 
Once other considerations -- "coastal access," "a decent job market," "a native culture that’s already pro-liberty" -- are taken into account, Sorens says, four potential targets stand out: Delaware, New Hampshire, Wyoming, and Alaska.
Why the coastal access consideration?

And, last I looked, Idaho and Oregon were still stubbornly blockading the Wyoming coastline. :D

- pdmoderator
 
I've pledged to move once the state is selected, and visit the site about once a week to check in on how things are going. There is occasionaly a real time chat on this supject at Sierrratimes.com at 12:00 MST on Sat.

In preperation for this, I'm looking at what work skills are in demand. I can do just about anything. I've done ameuture plumbing, constrution, landscaping/nursery work. Spend 10 years working in BioTech on Process Development/Production. I currently work in IT as a Network/System Admin, and can write code when I have too. What I'm looking at for the future is Vet Tech, Peace officer or Snowboard bum :D

I'm pulling for Western States, notably Montana and Big Sky. I love the mountain, would be just please as punch to live in 'em surrounded by lots of sweet runs in the winter, and dark scary woods in the summer.
 
MitchShaft - I'm a signed member of the FSP.

The reason for coastal access is for better trade access. How much advantage a coastline would to trade in the modern world I don't know, though. Personally, I'd love Wyoming or Montana. And New Hampshire wouldn't be bad ('cept for that one nut living there... ;)).
 
I'm not a group, so I had to do it alone, and New Hampshire seemed about the best place for at first, me, and then us, to go.

I can't really uproot and move on demand, since the pay I get requires a good technical job, and there is the wife, not to mention, the mortgage, to support, but I do support the project. Were I a bit younger, we'd sign on.

All things considered, though, I'm hoping that they select New Hampshire.

I can use all the help I can get!

As for the "grouping" comment, how about "We must hang together or we will hang alone?" At least you could put up a better fight, working with friends, and take a few of the bastards with you.

In either case, the end, given their forceful desire, wouldn't be in doubt.

But then, so it goes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top