i think the awesome smith trigger lives only in the mind of those who think they look prettier than rugers.
After careful comparison, I think the DA trigger is almost equal between my 686 and GP100. I actually prefer the DA pull of the GP. BUT, the Smith action feels slightly shorter and I like the reset better. The GP100 reset is weak, and at the 95% mark, there's a small hitch and it gets even weaker. This is where you can short stroke it. After a couple thousand dryfires, my new GP100 actually stopped resetting all the way until I opened it and lubed it. At first, I thought a spring broke, but that was not the case. The Smith goes forward well enough the first 1/3 the way, then it sproings forward like a race horse. It's fairly impossible to short stroke.
SA trigger: dunno what yours was like, but my 686 trigger is beyond good. It's positively magical. In comparison, every 1911 trigger, every 22 target pistol, every RIFLE I've shot is total crap. I had to smack the hammer and even drop it onto the carpet while cocked to convince myself it's safe. There's zero pretravel/creep, and is has UNDERtravel. You put ~2 1/2 lbs of force on the trigger, and the hammer falls for seemingly no reason, accompanied by the trigger moving FORWARD. There's no perceptible backward movement of the trigger, whatsoever. So it really feels like the gun fires without even pulling the trigger. To be fair, it's a pre-MIM -1.
My GP SA trigger is very good, but it's not magic. If the Smith is David Copperfield making the Statue of Liberty disappear, the Ruger is Criss Angel pushing a nail through his cheek.
And for the record, I think my GP100 is better looking than any Smith I've ever seen. Except maybe the 629.