Grand jury indicts Pelo on rape charges

Status
Not open for further replies.

exar

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2006
Messages
488
Location
Indiana
Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:27 PM CDT

Grand jury indicts Pelo on rape charges

By Brett Nauman
[email protected]



UPDATE: BLOOMINGTON -- A Bloomington police sergeant has been indicted on charges accusing him of raping four women between December 2002 and January of 2005.

Sgt. Jeff Pelo, 41, faces up to 45 years in prison on the most serious of 35 charges against him in the violent sexual attacks. The indictments were released to the public Thursday morning in McLean County Circuit Court.

A grand jury indicted Pelo late Wednesday afternoon, but the indictments weren't made public until they arrived in the Circuit Clerk's Office this morning.

Prosecutors say Pelo attacked the four women - all single and in their 20s - at their homes in Bloomington over the three-year period.

Pelo is currently jailed on $2 million bond and will be arraigned on the sexual assault charges Friday before Judge Ronald Dozier.

Steve Skelton, Pelo's attorney, said there was no surprise with the number of indictments and that he believes in his client's innocence.

"The prosecution has made up their mind. They're going to go forward. That's their prerogative," Skelton said. "We'll do everything we can to make sure this is quickly and appropriately resolved."

Pelo has been on paid administrative leave since his arrest in June for attempted residential burglary. Police said they found him lurking outside a Bloomington woman's shortly after she called 911, saying someone was trying to break in. The sergeant was later charged with stalking the woman.

The indictments published Thursday against Pelo indicate there was an escalation of violence leading up to the final attack on Jan. 26, 2005.

Pelo is accused of being armed with a knife and a gun when he broke into the final victim's home, according to the indictment.

While in the woman's home, Pelo is accused of raping the woman in several different ways, including the use of multiple objects.

He is charged with 18 counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault, two counts of home invasion, residential burglary, aggravated unlawful restraint and intimidation in the Jan. 26, 2005 attack.

According to the indictments, the intimidation charge stems from a threat Pelo made against the woman's family if she were to call police after he left her home.

In each of the first two attacks, Pelo is charged with four counts of criminal sexual assault. Those attacks occurred Dec. 18, 2002 and April 4, 2003.

In the third attack, which occurred Jan. 4, 2005, Pelo faces one count each of aggravated criminal sexual assault, home invasion, residential burglary and unlawful restraint.

The indictments accuse Pelo of being armed with either a knife or firearm in each of the first three sexual attacks.

http://www.pantagraph.com/articles/2006/08/10/news/doc44db4f4b94080893728534.txt
 
Interesting but don't quite see how it fits in the L&P mission statement:

Get informed on issues affecting the right to keep and bear arms and other civil rights. Coordinate activism, debate with allies and opponents. Discuss laws concerning firearm ownership, concealed carry and self-defense.

Could you clarify, please?
 
Get informed on issues affecting the right to keep and bear arms and other civil rights. Coordinate activism, debate with allies and opponents. Discuss laws concerning firearm ownership, concealed carry and self-defense.
 
Which civil rights are you referring to? This looks like any other serial rapist who has got caught - the only difference is that it is a cop who was indicted. I really think you're reaching a bit with this one.
 
My sister lives in Bloomington, I live an hour away. What I find AMAZING is that all those "psychological" tests that he had to go through to be hired onto the Bloomington P.D. didn't catch that he was seriuosly disturbed. Imagine that! I am so glad that those tests screen out all of the bad cops before they can become bad cops!:rolleyes:

This does not really fit the mission statement though, I must agree.

But I must wonder, if the victims would have lived in a less "progressive" liberal town and state, would they had a higher chance of being armed and able to stop these attacks the first time? If there wasn't at least a 30-60-90 :)cuss: ) day wait for the state police to procces the FOID application, plus the waiting period to recive the handgun/shotgun for self defence, would one or two of the victims been more willing to purchase such equalizers to protect themselves against the threat of a serial rapist roaming B-N?

These questions are the ones to be raised when such an incidence occurs, not who exactly the rapist is.
 
Which civil rights are you referring to?

The right to privacy since these cases involved home invasions that *more than likely* involved the officer abusing his power to gain easy entry and the victim's unwillingness to resist entry to the home when they knew they had done nothing worthy of their home being searched. Noone should feel that their privacy can be invaded at whim. Why would someone who could commit such viscious acts be given so much authority?
 
Don't know if the victems would have purchased a handgun to prevent this, BUT didn't someone just post a thread on here about the city of Bloomington draging their feet on people being issued CCW's? IF guilty he will get his "pay backs" in prison. I also hope the victems sue the city over the CCW issue.
 
If we have to guess how a post fits in with THR's mission statement, it probably doesn't. I hope for more than tangential relevance when I come here.
 
There is no CCW in Bloomington, or any of The Peoples Socialist Democratic Republik of Illinois for that matter!:what: This is the land of the sheeple, home of the meek. There will never be CCW here untill Chicago burns to the ground again, and it had better take most of the 'burbs with it. Where is that damn cow when you REALLY need a lamp kicked over anyway!

You have to have a FOID (Firearms Owner ID) card to buy firearms OR ammo in this socialist state, which is a left-handed form of REGISTRATION! It is suposed to be issued 30 days after your application by LAW, but often it takes much longer to recive, if they haven't "lost" it that is. Then, at least, you would think "Hey, I passed and got my FOID like a good little pesant, at least I won't have to endure a waiting period to recive my shinny new firearm becaused they already passed me and my background." WRONG! You still have to wait 2 days to recive your firearm after passing your NCIS check. :cuss:

Now how could anyone new to firearms, say a woman scared for her life, get a firearm in time to save herself from a situation like this one. Call the cops? Hey, in this case the perp was a cop!:confused:

The perp being a cop really has nothing to do with anything. What bothers me is the perpetual state of victimhood the pesants of this state have to live in, as mandated by one geographic area with too many idiots living in it.:banghead:

Once again, I call for illoinois to become TWO states, Illinois, and Norhthern Illinois. Only then can the pesants be free.
 
The right to privacy since these cases involved home invasions that *more than likely* involved the officer abusing his power to gain easy entry and the victim's unwillingness to resist entry to the home when they knew they had done nothing worthy of their home being searched. Noone should feel that their privacy can be invaded at whim. Why would someone who could commit such viscious acts be given so much authority?
WOW and from the guy that actually started the thread and posted the story

Police said they found him lurking outside a Bloomington woman's shortly after she called 911, saying someone was trying to break in. The sergeant was later charged with stalking the woman.
If he was using his uniform to gain entry why would he be trying to break in, and wouldn't he have his radio on to alert him to police presence if he was in uniform
He is charged with 18 counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault, two counts of home invasion, residential burglary, aggravated unlawful restraint and intimidation in the Jan. 26, 2005 attack.
All those charges but no abuse of authority charge ?
In the third attack, which occurred Jan. 4, 2005, Pelo faces one count each of aggravated criminal sexual assault, home invasion, residential burglary and unlawful restraint.
And still no abuse of authority charge.

Wouldn't there "more than likely" be some sort of charges relating to abuse of authority in there if he "more than likely" used his authority to assist in committing these crimes?
 
Interesting but don't quite see how it fits in the L&P mission statement:
You answered your own question CarKnocker
the only difference is that it is a cop who was indicted
What I find AMAZING is that all those "psychological" tests that he had to go through to be hired onto the Bloomington P.D. didn't catch that he was seriuosly disturbed. Imagine that! I am so glad that those tests screen out all of the bad cops before they can become bad cops
The right to privacy since these cases involved home invasions that *more than likely* involved the officer abusing his power to gain easy entry and the victim's unwillingness to resist entry to the home when they knew they had done nothing worthy of their home being searched. Noone should feel that their privacy can be invaded at whim. Why would someone who could commit such viscious acts be given so much authority?
You can't get good bashing like that, and what's to come, if the guy was a banker or plumber
 
If I remember correctly, he did not use his uniform to get into the houses. He did it like a "normal" burglar/home invader. Dressed in dark clothes. When he was caught, it was because he was walking in the neighborhood near the house of the last victim, and he looked suspicious because of the dark clothing. It wasn't untill he was being checked out that the real cops realised that the perp was also a cop, wearing wolf's clothing at the time.

I think there may have been probems in his own home with his wife, a domestic maybe?, but I could be wrong.

I anyone is truly interested, they can look up the case in the Bloomington Pantagraph to get the details of the actual arrest.
 
abuse of authority?

http://cgb.obworld.com/index.cfm?d=news&p=read&newsid=1522

Prosecutors later said Pelo used personal information in a police report, which was filed by the woman sometime last year, in stalking her. Skelton said official reports will show if Pelo had contact with any of the victims, and he did not have access to those reports.



maybe not charged cause they don't need those "lesser included charges"
we had a "good cop " in manassas that was a sexual predator and in retrospect shoulda been seen for what he was. but its a lot like familial abuse its hard to believe
 
Prosecutors later said Pelo used personal information in a police report, which was filed by the woman sometime last year, in stalking her. Skelton said official reports will show if Pelo had contact with any of the victims, and he did not have access to those reports.
Or not charged because it is merely speculation that can't be proved
Either way it does not mesh with him using his authority
to gain easy entry and the victim's unwillingness to resist entry to the home when they knew they had done nothing worthy of their home being searched.
Which would imply that he used his uniform to gain access.

Some criminals are smart, smart enough to fool the police into hiring them
Some criminal tendancies are latent, enough that they can be suppressed long enough to become a veteran police officer.

But as I have implied this is only newsworthy here because he's a cop, the only better fodder would be a preacher
 
at least

they got him and did it by the numbers.
i live in a place in va where the head of the sheriffs dept started in some cadet program with them when he was 17 and worked his way up. the old fashioned way. got education as well as experience and leads the old fashioned way. from in front. tolerates no bs and as a result his dept shines is it perfect? nope one former detective is a fugitive right now, but he fired a guy on the spot after he slapped his ex g/f. hated to see that guy was a decent cop but he holds em to a high standard. and they live up to it.
just like when fairfax owned up to screwing up when they killed the unarmed eye doctor handling things promptly and openly defuses the bad reaction
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top