Roadwild17
Member
I watched something about swat teams and the federal Hert teams or whatever there called (cant remember) but I noticed how they would describe certain weapons. They referred to a .50cal as a "massive gun that has a gas break." So what, why would they say anything about a gas break instead of saying that it was an anti-tank gun? Because it wasn't an anti-tank gun and i guess they felt the need to put a negative public opinion on the gun. Another instance that comes to mind is a buddy of mine who got his G-19 consficated. He was underage but said something about its legal to own a hand gun as long as 1. Your over the age of 18 and 2. Someone over 21 buys the gun for you and does a "handwritten transfer." Now I'm not here to argue over weather not not he broke the law (I personally think he did but that's just my $.02). But when the person who bought him the gun went to retrieve it, the sheriff gave him a hard time saying "This is a Glock 19 9mm sim-auto assault weapon." Its just a glock and here is the sheriff trying to make it sound like hes holding an illegal assault weapon, why is it that authorities do this? Is it just to try and paint people who happen to have a connection with that specific weapon and a law breaker?
Man did I screw up the title lol!
Man did I screw up the title lol!