IDPA/USPSA 9mm Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

david636

Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
21
Location
St. Charles, Missouri
A question for those with some IDPA/USPSA experience.

This has probably been asked a thousand times....but;
If you wanted to shoot the same 9mm in IDPA SSP and USPSA Production, and wanted the pistol to cost less that $650, which gun would you choose?

Thanks in advance.
 
I would get a get a M&P, M&PL or Pro. There is always the Glock 34 too. Smith has been running a special for two free mags with the purchase of a M&P. That would give you 4 magzines and you would just need 1 or 2 more magazines and would still keep you well under $650. You would be right on the edge of $650 with a good Comp-Tac or Blade Tech holster and, some mag pouches. I prefer the M&P because, now it is cheaper than a Glock, has 3 sizes of grips, good sights, steel guide rod and (IMO) feels and points better. If you get the glock you may want to change the sights. I have shot in IDPA and USPSA and the Glock and M&P performed flawless.

You will 4 to 5 magazines for USPSA and, 3 magazines for IDPA.

Hope that helps some,

Chris
 
I shoot in the production category with a Beretta 92FS. The gun with 4 -10 round nickle mags, a Safariland belt with holster and mag pouches cost me less than $650. The 92FS has a nice long barrel and is used by the U.S. Army Marksmanship Unit. They do have them accurized but a stock 92FS is reported to be better fit and more accurate than the M-9.
 
The M&P.


but I would get the 40 not the 9mm. that way you can make major in USPSA
 
I started using a G17 in USPSA Production, IDPA Stock Service Pistol and Steel Challenge Stock Service Pistol. The gun has been enhanced with a Glockworx trigger and a magwell- so I now shoot it in Limited and Enhanced Service Pistol. It is slightly penalized by making minor power factor- but I get 23 rounds in an extended mag and if you shoot "A's" it doesn't matter what the power factor is.
The M&P or the XD are nice guns as well, but GLOCKs are much more prevalent and there are a lot more toys out there for them.
 
if you shoot "A's" it doesn't matter what the power factor is.

Ah, there's the rub, shooting all As.
I once read that Tommy Campbell, the S&W rep, would have won several big matches if he had been shooting major but he placed tenth or so with his S&W 9mm Supergun (M52 length barrel and slide on a M59 action, pretty much.) So he shot a Colt for a short time untill an executive asked why he was not brand loyal. He explained the scoring system and got permission to build the one-off .45 Supergun II.
 
if you shoot "A's" it doesn't matter what the power factor is.

yeah, only guy shooting major also shot all As... Really, unless you can't handle the recoil of major. there is no reason not to shoot major.
 
unless your shooting Production or SSP, ESP, GSSF, steel challenge :D
 
In Production USPSA, all calibers shoot Minor.. even the 45. Now if you want to shoot Limited or Limited 10, then the 40 is worth it..
 
any gun (M&P, G35,22, XD) in 40 is the most versatile. In IDPA you can shoot SSP/ESP. USPSA you can shoot production or you can shoot Limited/Limited 10 (Major PF).
 
.40 is the most versatile, but you are handicapping yourself everywhere except L10 and Limited with the added recoil IMHO. I even use 9mm for Limited, since I get 3 extra rounds in a 140mm mag.
 
As several have already mentioned the G17 and G34 are great pistols. I went with the XD9 Tactical, however, due to my preference for that particular grip angle.
 
I would recommend that you take some of the suggestiosn and rent them. Find a range where you can rent a glock, M&P, XD, etc. Try them out. I havent heard anyone complain about M&P grips, but lots dont like glocks. Either they fit you or they dont, its that easy. The only real way to know is to try it. It may cost 100 bucks to rent them all to try, but its worth it if it saves you from buying a gun that doesnt perform well for you.
 
If your reloading, the cost is almost the same. Even if your buying factory ammo the price per 100 is only a buck or 2 diffrence.

Both 9 and 40 brass is easy to come by.
 
Yeah, it’s only about $20/1000 if you reload range brass and $100/1000 for factory. Still no need to waste the money, a 9mm “plastic of your choice” is ideal for SSP and Production and less than ideal for the other classes. Sure you could compete in almost every class with a 40 glock, for example, but you wouldn’t even come close in Open and be handicapped in many others. Even the shooters that have purchased one gun for ESP and Limited (a regular dust cover S_I in 40) don’t have the best gun for either. Hey, you need a reason to get another pistol down the road anyway.
 
As others have said, the Glock 17/34 or M&P, in 9mm

SSP and Production divisions don't have a "major scoring" element. EVERYONE scores minor, even if you're shooting full power, tooth jarring Double Tap 10mm ammo out of a Glock 20.

A .40 would be more versatile, but only if you reloaded or didn't mind putting up with extra kick that no one else you're trying to beat is putting up with.

Add a World/National title winning KyTac Sooper Hooper and mag pouches, you're good to go.

.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top