1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

If Full-Auto Were Legal..Would You?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by amprecon, Dec 23, 2005.

  1. amprecon

    amprecon Well-Known Member

    If Full-Auto weapons were not illegal, would you have one or more? I have never fired a fully-automatic weapon, it does look cool, but how effective is it? I can see at close range it would be useful, but even semi-auto can be fired pretty fast. I'm not so sure that I'd even want one, say they were the same price as the semi-auto versions, just the cost of the ammunition would be astronomical. When I take my Garand, or AK to range, I'm completely satisfied to crank off rounds in quick succession and hit the gongs. I just wonder how many of those rounds would hit the gongs if fired at the same range in full-auto. It's so hypocritical of the government to ban them being that 00 buck-shot is essentially the same thing out of a shotgun aside from maybe the effective range. A full-auto MP5 sends 9mm rounds out one after the other, a 12-gauge shotgun with 00 buck sends about 10 .32 caliber sized lead balls all at once in one shot, isn't that considered full-auto too? Same amount of fire-power only the 12-gauge sends them out all at once rather than in succession. 10-round burst from MP5, 10 9mm projectiles downrange, 1 burst from 12-gauge shotgun loaded with 00 buck, 10 .32 caliber projectiles downrange, where's the logic?
  2. Third_Rail

    Third_Rail Well-Known Member

    Yes; area denial weaponry; reasoning - you never know.
  3. Zedicus

    Zedicus Well-Known Member

    Dude, look around this site, do you realy need to ask?:D :p

    In short, YES!:D
  4. MatthewVanitas

    MatthewVanitas Well-Known Member

    Not to nitpick, but FA is legal, just heavily regulated.

    Despite the ardent wishes of many members of the board, I don't think FA would be that popular after the "forbidden fruit" aspect wore off. Older FA would be collected like other milsurps, some toy "buzz guns" would be popular, and not a whole ton would change in firearms overall.

    If the NFA disappeared tomorrow, I just about bet the the primary post-NFA products would involve barrel length: short-barreled shotguns would take up a lot of the home defense market, and M4-geries would be relplaced by the 14.5" barrel versions.

    Probably the main change in terms of FA would be that we'd be able to buy genuine military weapons rather than the neutered versions. Many ranges still wouldn't allow FA fire anyway, and most folks would kepe their ARs, etc. on single for 95% of the time, probably just using burst/full as an occasional lark, or to finish off a farewell mag at the end of the range session. If it only cost $20 to add the additional sears during production, I figure some manufacturers would.

    Anybody else agree? I still think it would be fitting and proper to allow FA, but after reflection, I don't think it would change any of my buying habits, except getting an un-neutered (virile?) AR lower.

  5. MTMilitiaman

    MTMilitiaman Well-Known Member

    Yes, if full auto were cheaper and easier to get, such as if the NFA was repealed, I would own automatic weapons. I think a Glock 18, Mini Uzi 45, MP5 10mm Auto, PKM, and a couple others would be nifty. How practical it is really isn't a concern for me. It is better to have full auto and not need it than to need it and not have it. And it could be fun.
  6. chopinbloc

    chopinbloc Well-Known Member

    full auto can be pretty darn devastating at close range, especially the three round burst used on the m4 and m16a2. no, you're not likely to hit anything at range with any but the first round on full auto but it keeps their heads down and there are some very limited situations where a massive volume of fire is essential. they are legal, just expensive. i suppose you mean that if the '34 gca never happened, would i buy one? yes, absolutely. matter of fact most of the rifles i own would have been offered in select fire standard and probably wouldn't have semi only except as an option. so odds are that my three ars, my ak, my mini14 and my m1a would all have been the select fire versions. heck, i'd probably buy a tec9 or mac 10 if they were full auto, just for fun. an uzi would make a great car gun and cheaper than the mp5.

    i take it from your location and the fact that you've never fired a full auto weapon that you're a zoomie or a contractor. hmmm, i'll put five on kbr.:cool: am i close?
  7. bakert

    bakert Well-Known Member

    Not my thing but I know a few people that have them (fully licensed) and love 'em.
  8. CannonFodder

    CannonFodder Well-Known Member

    Of course. Did you really have to ask? :cool:
  9. grimjaw

    grimjaw Well-Known Member

    If it wasn't as heavily regulated and expensive, sure. I can think of a few subguns that would be a hoot.

  10. Majic

    Majic Well-Known Member

    Not me because I don't want the job of feeding one.
  11. chickenfried

    chickenfried Well-Known Member

    Only in .22 lr :)
  12. psyopspec

    psyopspec Well-Known Member

    I would, but it wouldn't fill the niche of hunting, home defense, or carry. Basically they'd be "fun guns" except for perhaps something like a SBR for HD. Probably wouldn't need the FA option on it though.
  13. lawson

    lawson Well-Known Member

    it would be fun, but i spending that much on ammo would not be worth it to do often.

    though, if i could get my hands on one of those .22LR smg's that dick casull invented, can't remember the name of them off the top of my head.

    on that thought, do you think legalizing class III firearms would create a market for full-auto .22 firearms?
  14. Valkman

    Valkman Well-Known Member

    They're not illegal unless your state bans them, and they're legal here. We have get togethers here where you can shoot all kinds of FA guns, plus the ranges rent them. We have weekly FA matches at the range! I have an Uzi. :)
  15. jrpeterman

    jrpeterman Well-Known Member

    If all regulations and taxes were lifted on the firearm and civilians could purchase them for the same price which law enforcement agencies purchase them for rather than paying $ 15,000.00 per gun, then heck ya
  16. fredcwdoc

    fredcwdoc Well-Known Member

    What would even be the point of owning one?

    I would have to have two!
  17. amprecon

    amprecon Well-Known Member

    Don't know what a zoomie is but not KBR, DynCorp Int'l C-12/UC-35A LCCS. I think the only full-auto I'd really be interested in would be making my 10/22 full auto and a M1A1 Thompson, now that'd be a hoot.
  18. Devonai

    Devonai Well-Known Member

    I still want an H&K 51 with the belt-feed conversion. Ever since I was standing right behind the guy firing one up in Dover-Foxcroft, Maine and it almost blew my freaking hat off my head, I was sold.
  19. Matthew748

    Matthew748 Well-Known Member

    I sure would. Savings and retirement planning would take the back seat for a year or so. I would get a full-auto FAL (I am sure DSA would be making them for the public if they could), something in .22lr, and a fully automatic BAR if someone came out with a reproduction. I am assuming that the prices on the original classic BARs would remain high due to collector value.

    Santa, are you listening?
  20. chopinbloc

    chopinbloc Well-Known Member

    zoomie is a slightly derogatory nickname used for air force.

    oh, and i really, really want an american 180. heck, i'd use one for home defense if it ran reliably.

Share This Page