Yeah, little poodles to tend to like to chomp. I wonder if one of the ancestors for the inbreed breed was psychotic?
Of all the dogs I've known, most were nice. The bulldogs were the nicest most laid back I knew. I knew of one that tolerated her family's baby chewing on her, grabbing folds of skin and yanking, and crawling all over her. If it got too bad, she'd just start licking the kid.
So what's their definition of dangerous? Dogs capable of harm, or likely to cause harm? A bulldog is capable of causing harm, but they've been bred to be generally so laid back that I don't hear of too many attacks. Pit Bulls are a different story, though. Heck, Boston Terriers dropped the bull from "Boston Bull Terriers", because of the notion that "Bull Terriers" are vicious. You could be robbing my parents house and all their dogs would do would be beg for snacks and pets.