Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
Very nice, VGC! I have no experience with the Bodyguards, but I've owned a 686 for almost 30 years. You're going to love that revolver, if you don't already.
Very nice, VGC! I have no experience with the Bodyguards, but I've owned a 686 for almost 30 years. You're going to love that revolver, if you don't already.
I had the Taurus 66 in almost identical form factor, save for the Taurus's 6" barrel as compared to the Smith's 5". So yeah, I "loved it" before I got it, in a way, and the awesome fit, finish and trigger of the Smith helps me shoot it all the better. =)
I'm on the edge about the Bodyguard. It fits its intended purpose well, but it's rough for me to shoot straight. I think a big part of that is the generally unpleasant DAO trigger, on a 14oz gun. More range time needed on my part, more than likely. I'm working up a nice soft .38 load just for the occasion...
Same here with my Airweight 637. I can punch my 4" & 6" revolvers through one ragged hole. The snubbie ... not so much. Those light-weight, short-barrel guns are definitely a challenge. On the bright side, it helps add justification to spending more time at the range!
I like my Taurus 66s just fine. Only Smiths I've owned were a M19, a M10, and a M1917. I still have the M10. It's nice, but the 4" 66 is more accurate and the 3" 66 is just as accurate. The 4" 66 has a nicer trigger, too.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.