Kimber Owners, Good or Bad Experiences?

Do you like your Kimber?

  • Yes! I love my Kimber! You'll only pry it out of my cold, dead hands!

    Votes: 117 57.4%
  • Kimbers are fine quality, good entry level pistols.

    Votes: 30 14.7%
  • My Kimber is okay, but I've had better guns.

    Votes: 15 7.4%
  • My Kimber wasn't that great. I probably won't buy another.

    Votes: 29 14.2%
  • I hate Kimbers! If you give one to me, I'll throw it back in your face!

    Votes: 13 6.4%

  • Total voters
    204
Status
Not open for further replies.

dcarch

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2010
Messages
1,040
Location
The Hawkeye State
Just a little poll to see how "bad" of a gun Kimbers really are. Please vote if you had a bad or a good experience with a Kimber, so that potential users can see the percentage of "lemons" that are actually out there. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
I have had a Target II for about 3 years and it has been trouble free from day one. It's also very accurate. I just put a Pro Carry II on layawy and am already thinking about a third. Maybe a Stainless II.
 
Most late model ones are good, just stay away from the models with the external extractors, these seem to have problems.
 
I have a brand new Super Carry and find it to be a fine handgun. The trigger is not as good as my only other 1911, which is a Wilson Combat; but I also paid more for the Wilson used than I did for the Kimber new.

I've shot the Kimber in training and competition and carried it concealed and on duty and have no concerns with its quality or reliability.
 
My TLE/RL II has been flawless and very accurate. Happy Kimber owner here.
 

Attachments

  • IMG00209-20110109-2233.jpg
    IMG00209-20110109-2233.jpg
    186.6 KB · Views: 38
My experience was not good.

I owned a Custom II and a Pro Carry II. I purchased them new around 2008 and they had internal extractors.

The barrels on both would rust. I used Breakfree CLP at the time and the metal was coated in oil. Nevertheless, they both would rust.

Neither was reliable. Both had failure to feed and failure to eject.

Both had too many problems and both were traded for other guns.
 
Mine are older models, a Target from 1999 and a Gold Match from 2000.

They have both been reliable and extremely accurate pistols. Out of the box the rear sight on the Gold Match was stuck and would not adjust. The Target has over 10K rounds through it and except for a recent incident where the little nut on the rear sight fell off, it has been a really good pistol.

Would I buy another one? Probably not. Their prices have gone way up, higher than what they deserve in my opinion, and their quality control seems to come and go. While my experience has been decent, several of my friends have purchased them in recent years and have had reliability issues.

STI or Springfield make a better quality pistol in my opinion and both have excellent customer service if you should need it.
 
I've carried my Kimber Compact for a dozen years and shot many thousands of rounds through it. It's flawlessly reliable.

I can't speak for the newer models...

Kimber.jpg
 
I have two ultra carry's - one for me and one for my wife. We each had a couple FTE's in the first 100 rounds and they have been flawless since. Trusted and on my side daily.
 
Three up, three down; Kimber struck out with me. I was able to make ONE of them reliable enough to trust for daily carry. All were from the much-worshiped early period, and all were 5" guns.

No, it was not user error; my 5" Colts all ran fine. My Les Baer TRS, my only remaining 1911, still runs fine.
 
Short version. I bought a Stainless Ultra Compact. It went back to Kimber 5 times. Last time the frame cracked at 2000 rounds. After my dealer threatened to not sell Kimbers anymore unless they made it right they sent me another. Same outcome. They sent my an all steel gun that they promised would work. It did for 5 magazines. Then problems. Sold it and got a HK .45c. Great gun never looked back. I'm still seeing to many problem Kimbers at the range to buy one. That and alot of the major name gunsmiths won't work on them. Says alot.
 
Between my dad and I, we probably have around 25 Kimbers, all different models from early to late.

Honestly the only issues we've seen are with external extractor models, especially the 3" (Ultra) size. In my opinion, I'd stay away from any Kimber with the external extractor, even if its a full-size gun. Anything else has been stuff you'd run into with other pistols (replacing springs, etc).

I have nothing but good things to say about the brand, to be honest. I have no problems with reliability, even with our reloaded ammo (Dillon gear). My original series 1 Pro Carry is my daily carry.

//edit:
I should say, you can call me a raging fanboy. But if I'm a fanboy, its only because they really have been excellent in our case. If something sucks, I have absolutely no problems pointing it out. I'm not the blind type of fanboy who praises the thing and just refuses to recognize its downfalls.
 
Last edited:
i voted the top one, but thats just how i feel about it now. it didnt start out that way.

ive had mine for 8-9 years, a pro carry 2, and yes, it does have the external extractor.

at first it did have problems. the most common problem is it would fail to return to full battery. it would stop just 1/4" shy as if the barrel link was too long or something.

i called kimber and got the ole' "well, run 500rds through it" (which i hated) but i decided to go ahead and keep it as a fun gun, and pour the ammo to it often. (i honestly would have never carried it as a primary weapon at first)

it would have a failures to go into battery several times per range trip, maybe 5-6 times per 100rds or so, but it was sooo accurate i stuck with it. many times a 7rd group would look like a ragged hole @15yds.

it did in fact start improving @ around 500rds or so, and kept getting better and better.

the pistol now has thousands of rounds, and is dead nuts reliable and easily the most accurate 1911 ive ever owned (ive only owned 5" colt gov models before this one, 3 to be exact). for a 4" 1911 that weighs 28oz, its very easy shooting, very light for a 1911, and amazingly accurate, and im now sure i will own it for the rest of my life.

i couldnt say when it had its last malfunction of any kind, but i know it has been thousands of rounds, and at least five years. it is still very tight fit between slide and frame.

the long "break-in period" honestly was difficult, and i honestly cant say whether or not i would do it again. as good as the pistol has turned out to be, i probably would. hard to say, but i do know that i love it now. it is my everyday carry pistol now, and provided it continues to perform at the level that it does, it always will be.

sorry for going so long in your thread, but i figured i'd share what my experience had been.
 
I have two. I am amazed at those who do not have good luck with these firearms.
You're amazed that anyone would have problems because you have a sample size of two that work fine? My sample size is one with nothing but problems, but all I will say is my particular Kimber is problematic. I have four STIs and two Colts that are completely trouble free, but I wouldn't be shocked if someone else had a problem. There are a lot of 1911s made by those three to paint them all either good or bad. Nothing personal, really. :)

At least it looks good. That's all I can say for it after 750 rounds.
KimberSCPwmagazine.jpg
 
Last edited:
I've had eight Kimbers so far.
There's only one reason I keep buying them--I have never had a problem with any of them.
If I could have said the same about Colt, Springfield or several other 1911 makers, I'd still be buying their products. I've also had trouble with the only Baer I've owned, as well as the only Dan Wesson.
 
My Kimber Pro TLE II was nothing more than an expensive paperweight. Three return trips to the factory for FTF with Wilson Combat and Tripps Research magazines was enough for me. Never again.
 
My bad experience is their price tag.

They have nice fit and finish but I would buy a Sringfield loaded almost every time just because the price is nicer for yet another fine pistol.
 
Eclipse Custom II - Excellent

Tactical Custom II - I wish my Shop Vac sucked that much

Ultra Raptor - needed a little tweaking that should have been done at the factory.
 
People ask a lot, and I don't mind repeating. My Custom II is the best handgun I have ever owned. It is in a fanny pack in front of my laptop right now. It has had so few malfunctions of any kind I can't even recall them. (I bought it in 2003 or so for $630.) Many thousands of rounds, several different magazine types, including Kimber factory mags. I have no idea how many .22s I have shout through a conversion kit, tens of thousands. I carry it openly when I'm out in the desert, I carry it concealed in a variety of holsters, if I were allowed, I would carry it to war tomorrow. I have carried Glocks, Berettas, Sigs, S&Ws, Paras, Colts, etc. None of them work for me as well as Kimber. I am a fanboy because I tried everything else.

Several of my friends and family have subsequently bought 1911s, mostly Kimbers and Springfields. None have told me of significant problems. My best friend bought his wife a Kimber with the external extractor. Theyhaven't had any problems. I told them about the reports, and that Kimber will replace it for free, but he said he will wait until he sees a problem before he gets it fixed. My dad bought a Springfield Mil-Spec, and I like it just fine, but when we shoot, he says he really wishes it felt and worked more like my Kimber. I reminded him that he wanted a customizable entry level gun, and he will need to do some tweaking to make is better.

See, I call it Ford Taurus syndrome. Ford sold enough Tauruses to fill the Gulf of Mexico. Just about everyone I know has owned one at one time or another. Therefore, I know a lot of people who have had weird problems with them. This does NOT mean they they are more LIKELY to have a problem than other cars. It just means that there are MORE of them. Kimbers are the same way. They sell several TIMES more 1911-pattern pistols than their nearest competitor. This means there may be more reported problems in the marketplace. (Particularly on the internet, where people with guns that run just fine usually don't say anything, but people with problems shout them from the cyber mountaintops.) This does NOT mean there is a higher RATE or LIKELIHOOD of failure than other pistols.

I shot a Nighthawk at a rental range, with a $2700 price tag. Great. Probably better than a Kimber. But not three times better. And it jammed on me twice. All mechanical devices fail eventually.

I can only speak to the experience of myself and the guns of my friends and family I have personally shot and worked with. I had a terrible experience with a S&W Sigma that was so bad I wouldn't trust it to hold papers on my desk. When I detail THAT experience, I am sneered at for failing to recognize that I just got a lemon, and that doesn't mean that all Sigmas suck. Hey whatever. That is my experience. Take my, and ALL internet advice for exactly what you paid for it.
 
Fullsize Raptor Series II, internal extractor. I quit counting between 1000 and 1200 rds. The only failures I ever had were a couple failures to feed with the 22lr conversion installed.

It's my bedside guardian now.

Crappy quality? Bah!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top