Lee Enfield Action in Modern Rifles

Status
Not open for further replies.

cleardiddion

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
1,353
Location
US
We all know that many modern bolt rifles, such as the Remington 700, are based on the Mauser action. I was playing about with my LE tonight when a question kinda popped into my mind:

Are there any modern bolt rifles which base their design off of the Lee-Enfield?

Thanks in advance for the replies!
 
Last edited:
Ghost thread!


EDIT:

There are not any "modern" bolties based on the SMLE. there had been a commercial model sold under the name of an "Enfield Enforcer" i believe. it was a commercial production of almost the exact same SMLE as the military version. so id consider it a reproduction not based off the enfield. you can find some versions of the SMLE on the Marstar website. but more or less they are the same old design, often in .308
 
Last edited:
sorry, when i first clicked it came up blank. its happened in the past. a thread is created with out an original post

the OP is lost some how, and were left with a ghost thread.
 
I'm not aware of any modern firearms based on the Enfield action. I'd love to see one tho. The idea of a modern Enfield chambered in 7mm-08 , or .260 Remington gives me a tingly feeling in my stomach.:D
 
The older actions are locking to the rear, not the front. the later ones have mauser like lugs at the front (i think they are called P17 or something similar). so really they are not best for modern shorter high pressured cartridges.

interlock
 
I have the solution. Purchase old worn out Enfiled $100. Run to gunsmith and tell him what you want $$$.
 
The P14 was the secondry rifle of the British Empire during WWI. The P17 was American secondary rifle and both were a hybred design Enfield/Mauser design. The true Lee Enfield of WWI was the No 1 Mk 3, it was a legend.
 
Kentucky,
The P17, was this the one that locked at the front? It is my belief that the enfields that lock at the rear of the bolt give too much flex for modern hunting loads. What do you think?

interlock
 
The P17, was this the one that locked at the front? It is my belief that the enfields that lock at the rear of the bolt give too much flex for modern hunting loads. What do you think?

both the "p17" (actually a M1917) an P14 is a direct copy of a Mauser. it is in no way an Enfield in any manner other than name.

it shares no design similarities with the Lee Enfield design
 
The AIA rifles on the Marstar website are the only modern production/repros that I am aware of. The LE action will never support hotrod handloads as well as a front locked action, having said that, with tight chambering & proper control of reloaded haedspace they are still capable of being reloaded numbers of times if pressures are kept to sensible limits. I think the factory pressures in 7mm-08 & 260 Rem are as high as I would want to go in such a firearm & that was only assuming that all else was in perfect condition. Britain used No1 Mk4 rifles that were converted to 308 for many years as training target & sniper rifles so the basic design must be strong enough. Many years ago when I queried getting such a conversion done I was told the No1 Mk4* rifles from Longbranch in Canada (?) were the prefered ones to do this on, something to do with the metallurgy in them, but the British ones were just normal production ones, possibly crack tested, who knows. The AIA rifles are based on the No. Mk4 design which is significantly stronger than the SMLE Mk3s, other the the later Indian ones but thats a whole other subject for someone else.
Steve
 
both the "p17" (actually a M1917) an P14 is a direct copy of a Mauser. it is in no way an Enfield in any manner other than name.
Actually, the rifle we call the Lee-Enfield is properly called the Lee. Lee designed the action. The rifle originally had a Medford barrel, and was called the Lee-Medford. When the British switched from compressed black powder to cordite, the hotter flame temperature quickly eroded the Medford barrels, which were replaced by a barrel designed at Enfield.

The P13, although it owes a lot to the Mauser, was designed at Enfield, and can properly be called an Enfield, as can the P14 (a modified version developed by Remington and manufactured by Remington, Eddystone and Winchester.) At the end of that contract, the US had just entered the war, and the P14 was again modified for the .30-06 and was designated US Rifle, Model of 1917.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top