1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

LEO Carry Calif.

Discussion in 'Legal' started by shepherds56, Jun 19, 2007.

  1. shepherds56

    shepherds56 New Member

    Traveling to Calif....San Diego Area then to San Francisco with the family. Currently a Deputy Sheriff from another state. Will there be a problem with loaded hadgun in car etc?
  2. jselvy

    jselvy member

    I hope so.
    There is absolutely No reason for an out of jurisdiction LEO to be treated any different than an other citizen.

  3. ziadel

    ziadel Well-Known Member

    Amen to that.
  4. Nikdfish

    Nikdfish Well-Known Member

    If you are a "qualified law enforcement officer" under Title 18 USC § 926 (aka. HR 218/LEOSA 2004) you should be fine ... it preempts state & local concealed carry constraints for handguns (except for posted no firearms areas & posted govt. property). Not sure about any magazine capacity issues. Just carry your ID.

  5. jselvy

    jselvy member

    And the above is symptomatic of what is wrong with this country.

  6. glockman19

    glockman19 Well-Known Member

  7. jaholder1971

    jaholder1971 Well-Known Member

    Respectfully, this isn't the forum to ask IMHO. This is a question for your supervisors as you're carrying under your department's authority.
  8. jcoiii

    jcoiii Well-Known Member

    Call the city pd or county SO where you're going. You should be fine. I print off the US code and have it with me when I travel just in case though. And carry dept issued ID (and I carry my badge as well for ease of identification if I'm just seen out in public, as opposed to stopped in a car or something)
  9. isp2605

    isp2605 Well-Known Member

  10. Aguila Blanca

    Aguila Blanca Well-Known Member

    Why is it a question for his supervisors? Does the Federal law require that a supervisor specifically authorize a sworn LEO to carry when on vacation? I thought it automatically applied to all LEOs who are authorized to carry in the line of duty (and to retirees meeting certain requirements, but that's not pertinent to this question).
  11. Quiet

    Quiet Well-Known Member

    Contact CA DOJ BOF for the information you seek.
    (916) 263-4887

    Apparently, CA DOJ is still trying to figure out how to implement the Law Enforcement Officers' Safety Act of 2004.

    Don't bring any hi-cap magazines. CA law does not exempt LEO in bringing hi-cap magazines into the state for any reason.
  12. Roccobro

    Roccobro Well-Known Member

    If they are issue or Dept. authorized mags there is no problem. If you are currently employed, then all you need is a department issue ID. If retired or reserve also bring your latest qualification card.

    If you'd like a tour of the downtown San Diego or San Bernardino central jails give me a PM.

  13. Reyn

    Reyn Well-Known Member

    There are plenty of other cop bashing threads in this forum regarding this "Us vs Them mentality" Why make a post here that has nothing to do with the OP's original quest? No other reason than your are trying to provoke.
  14. Rumpled

    Rumpled Well-Known Member

    Yes, there will be a problem.

    A couple of simple points of CA law.
    CA recognizes NO other CCW.
    You do not have a CA CCW. (Issued by local jurisdictions)
    CA has not figured out how to implement HR 218

    I take this to mean you will not be allowed to carry, though you might get away with it; and you might be able to talk your way out of a felony.

    Check with CA DOJ BOF for more incorrect clarification.
    Here's a link

    CA DOJ seems to washing their hands (they do a lot of that)
  15. 209

    209 Well-Known Member

    Well, here's the thing about the LEOSA. Each state has a certain amount of latitude in implementing it. As an example, we still don't know for sure how NJ is interpreting their no HP ammo for anyone but on-duty officers.

    Although, not an expert on what CA is doing, I was out there in Oct of 2006, and didn't have a problem. All of the LEOs I met seemed to understand the law, even if the California Department of Justice can’t quite make up their mind what they’re doing.

    It could be an issue if you actually shoot anybody. :eek:
  16. gunsmith

    gunsmith member

    I was an armed security guard in SF

    at the cable car ticket booth, lots of out of state cops to talk too.
    They always packed, it was obvious to me and any cop.
    you will not have any problem whatsoever.
    Even before the bill had passed other cops wouldn't have said zip.

    just to be on the safe side, your a sworn officer, right? not one of those reserve ones?

    My brother in a NY LEO, his agency has told him no HP in NJ.

    if it is a good shoot then he would be fine, CA law is funny that way, I think it is called an affirmative defense (IANAL though) even us civvies are supposed to be ok, there was a test case oooooh maybe ten years ago??
    A guy wrote down the license plates of some taggers and shot them when they attacked him.
    he had no ccw but they kicked him loose anyway
  17. Autolycus

    Autolycus Well-Known Member

    I dont think of it as cop bashing when he is just stating the law and saying that the law is messed up. (This is in regards to his second comment about what is wrong with the country!) I mean we bash new laws all the time on this forum and that is ok, now we bash another law and suddenly we are cop haters? Come on now, which is it? Either you support gun control or you dont? I think Jefferson is just stating that he does not like the idea of anyone being prohibited from carrying a gun and that we should go to Vermont style carry.
  18. jselvy

    jselvy member

    Precisely Tecumseh,
    The "US vs. Them" attitude is an accurate reflection of the "some more equal than others" facts of US Law. The fact the the OP is even a question when ANY other citizen knows that CA would ea him alive while carrying is indicative that the Law Enforcement Community see themselves as being above the ordinary citizen. LEO's, when not on duty and especially when out of jurisdiction, are no different than any other citizen and should be treated as such.

  19. isp2605

    isp2605 Well-Known Member

    That is not correct info.
    If you read LEOSA you'll find that it exempts LEOs and qualified retirees from state laws. LEOSA is very specific in that regard. It goes so far as to list only the places and circumstances that a state can place restrictions. That's the point of LEOSA.
    Doesn't matter if CA doesn't recognize other CCW as LEOSA is not CCW. With LEOSA a LEO or qualified retiree does not need a CCW. LEOSA exempts LEOs from the need for a CCW.
    Doesn't matter if CA hasn't figured a way to implement it. The only things a state has to figure is how to qualify their retirees and that's only if the retiree's agency isn't qualifying them. For active LEOs all he needs is his photo ID card. For out of state retirees who have qualified as required then CA doesn't need to do anything.
    LEOSA isn't really that difficult of a bill to understand. I posted a link to it earlier. I have no idea why guys try to make it so difficult. It's really not.
    BTW, I dealt with implementing it in IL. Because of my position at the time I was somewhat involved in IL's program so I dealt with a lot of the behind the scenes things and am very familiar with what is required. Here's IL's program for retirees which was copied by several other states. www.rpocc.com
  20. isp2605

    isp2605 Well-Known Member

    (double tap)

Share This Page