MatthewVanitas
Member
I picked up a used Ithaca 72 Saddlegun recently, the predecessor of the current Henry lever-action .22. As I understand it, this model was designed by a New Yorker in the 60s, made for a couple different folks by factories in the US and West Germany, and then brought back by the designer's son under the "Henry" brand.
I'm actually really impressed by this little gun. It's a lot lighter than my Marlin 39, the trigger is about as good, and the lever is far smoother.
I understand that the Marlin is solid steel, and the Ithaca/Higgins/Erma/Henry has an aluminum receiver. How big a deal is that for long-term durability?
Is a steel receiver Taurus 63 (Win63 copy) going to last for millions of rounds more than a Marlin 60? Or is the steel just more durable in the sense of "will better survive being thrown from a moving car or dropped out the window"?
Has anyone seen, say, a Marlin 60 receiver that's actually worn out? Not just a worn feed throat or extractor, but an actual "beyond all use" worn aluminum receiver?
Thanks for any info,
-MV
I'm actually really impressed by this little gun. It's a lot lighter than my Marlin 39, the trigger is about as good, and the lever is far smoother.
I understand that the Marlin is solid steel, and the Ithaca/Higgins/Erma/Henry has an aluminum receiver. How big a deal is that for long-term durability?
Is a steel receiver Taurus 63 (Win63 copy) going to last for millions of rounds more than a Marlin 60? Or is the steel just more durable in the sense of "will better survive being thrown from a moving car or dropped out the window"?
Has anyone seen, say, a Marlin 60 receiver that's actually worn out? Not just a worn feed throat or extractor, but an actual "beyond all use" worn aluminum receiver?
Thanks for any info,
-MV