• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Marlin 1894C...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kentucky Rifle

Member In Memoriam
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
1,416
Location
Louisville, Ky.
Took the 1894 out again yesterday. I've gotta say it. This is ONE rifle that is just getting better & better.
When I first got it, I thought that it should be a little "smoother". However, after I've had it out a few times, it's smoothed out and is truly smooth as glass. When I got home, I field stripped and cleaned in less than 15 minutes. AND, it wouldn't even have taken 15 minutes if I hadn't stopped to admire this & that. Several years ago, I went shooting with a guy who turned to me and said, "Marlins are the best"! He was right. I've kinda settled on the Gold Dot 170gr "GDSP" as the .357 I like the best. Although to the Marlin, ANY load (that I've tried) is just fine.

KR
 
KR,
I don't see why. Steel is steel and finish should not make much of a difference, I think. The only reason I am asking is I saw something on this over on the Marlintalk forum and wondered what your experience might be.

I initially had some good groups but then they spread out. Could be my eyes (got a scope and will shoot it next week) or could be this is my first rifle and I am still working on form and shooting skills with long guns.

While I am doing that, I was interested in the effect of the barrel heating up and whether that's something affecting group size in this gun. If it's part of it, I will know and not drive myself crazy thinking it's only my shooting skills (or lack thereof):) .

Thanks for your input in any case. I do love the gun.

NA26
 
NA...

I've got a REAL bad back. I get tired fast just because I've got to use up so much "brain power" just to maintain an upright position. If I get just a little tired, my groups open up *dramatically.

KR
 
Steel is steel and finish should not make much of a difference
I disagree with this. Different steels are affected by heat in different manners, and dissipate that heat at different rates. There can be a vast difference in material specifications between steels, especially since stainless steel is such a fuzzy nomenclature (usually deals with the amount of chromium in the alloy). I am aware of at least one stainless versus carbon steel issue in handguns, namely in early S&W stainless steel revolvers. S&W had to redesign since the stainless steel handled heating differently than the carbon steels that they had sucessfully used for many years.

Since Marlin does not have a lot of experience with centerfire rounds and stainless steel, it is possible (not probable) that there is an issue related to barrel temperature. It is also possible there is a machining issue, although I think those issues are long in the past.
 
Kentucky Rifle,

You are right. What a neat rifle. I hope you've got a Ruger Blackhawk 38/357 to match.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top