Chris at http://anarchangel.blogspot.com/ just recently posted a long article comparing the various models and their features. I found it very useful. Just scroll down through the site until you find it.
I've owned three brands, the most recent of which is the CED M2. It works very well--and if you want the download feature to your computer for record keeping, it is really the one to consider. IMO.
Had a Competition Electronics for a couple of decades. Inexpensive, simple and worked well. It finally died. Bought a PACT and a few years later the CED w/IR. The PACT is in the garage somewhere.
I've been using a shooting chrony F1 and have been happy with it so far (3-4 sessions). Only 70 at midway at the moment so very soft on the wallet if you aren't trying to go hardcore and don't use it for hundreds of rounds+ each weekend. I use mine to work up loads and put together accurate ballistics tables. Good luck!
I've owned both an Oehler 35P and a Shooting Chrony. The Oehlers are pretty much the standard by which all other chronographs are judged. However... they're a giant PITA to set up compared to something like the Shooting Chrony. After comparing the velocities of the two side by side, there was no turning back. Shooting Chrony is where it's at. Plus you can buy the lowest model and upgrade it later all the way up the line to their most expensive model.
I've had a Quartz-Loc for (at least) 35 years. You can't get much simpler than that and it works good. It mounts on a camera tripod. Turn it on and shoot 6-8 inches over the top. Velocity holds on the LCD screen for about 10 seconds then resets itself to zero for the next one.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.