Now the gloves are certainly off.
Funny how the same chap who tells a woman this:
Take a Valium yourself; I do not indulge in such. Then perhaps you could be looking after the log in your own eye.
You still fail to see the grave difference between looting (are we sure? Perhaps they were in the process of "looting" in order to feed the hungry or clothe the naked; we cannot tell for sure from a contextless video) and forcibly depriving someone of a Constitutionally-protected right, the latter fully revealed in the video: nature of possession and the police reaction.
Being fair-minded does not require me to approve of evil. And disarming little old ladies -- or healthy young men -- in their own homes during a breakdown of civil order is purely and simply evil.
--Herself
Funny how the same chap who tells a woman this:
Then proceeds to say:M-Rex said:Take a valium and settle down.
...But of course what you're proffering is the great wisdom of the Mature Male In Uniform?M-Rex said:What you are doing is simply painting with a broad brush and generalizing. [...]
There's a word for what you are demonstrating.
Bigotry.
Take a Valium yourself; I do not indulge in such. Then perhaps you could be looking after the log in your own eye.
Yet you are "100% pro-police," are you? They were police. You're claiming you are not "pro" them. Explain.Those chippies who sacked that little old woman weren't on 'my' team. Nor were those two female NOPD winners who were walking around filling up their WalMart cart. They were disgraceful, and I sincerely hope their badges were torn from their respective chests after they returned to their departments.
You still fail to see the grave difference between looting (are we sure? Perhaps they were in the process of "looting" in order to feed the hungry or clothe the naked; we cannot tell for sure from a contextless video) and forcibly depriving someone of a Constitutionally-protected right, the latter fully revealed in the video: nature of possession and the police reaction.
I call BS! Have you not read a word I have written? --I'm okay-fine with The Man; I'm all in favor of the police...right up 'til the Boys in Blue try disarming me under NOLA-disaster conditions, at which point I will conceal and lie first in order to give the officers a chance to back down and shoot only if I must. But make no mistake: I'm not as nice as the grandmother in the video: I will shoot.What you are doing is simply painting with a broad brush and generalizing. I saw a cop do a bad thing, therefore ALL cops do bad things. Rant, rave, whine, complain, generalize, rinse, repeat...
You're darned right. I'm a bigot. I am extremely prejudiced against jack-booted thugs pretending to be peace officers. I think they should be hunted to extermination. I thought our modern society pretty much already had done so and all we had to worry about were the soft-headed wimps among brave and honest LEOs. NOLA proved me wrong.M-Rex said:There's a word for what you are demonstrating.
Bigotry.
Chaw on that.
Being fair-minded does not require me to approve of evil. And disarming little old ladies -- or healthy young men -- in their own homes during a breakdown of civil order is purely and simply evil.
--Herself