stubbicatt
Member
I have a buddy who is really into FALs. Thinks they are the greatest, an opinion I don't share.
Anyways.
He shoots Black Hills 168 grain match ammo through his high dollar rifles, and finds that he gets a huge zero shift from ball ammo through his FAL. Using a good scope, allegedly firmly attached to his FAL, he zeros his rifle with Portugese surplus ammo. Breaks out the box of BH, and his zero shifts up and right about 3". The grouping is not good at all, grouping larger than does his ball ammo group. To be sure it isn't a scope shift or something, he recommences with the ball, and the shots fall in the ball grouping.
That the ammo shoots to a different point of aim doesn't surprise me as much as does the fact that the group is not good at all, like 6" or something.
Oddly, his custom built M14 shoots tighter groups (no surprise) and the zero shift is only upwards an inch or two, and the groupings with the BH are quite tight, as one would expect.
He asks me what is causing this sort of aberrant performance in the FAL, and I don't have an answer. Is it possible that the FAL has a slower twist barrel that won't stabilize 168 grain bullets? What gives here?
Thanks.
Anyways.
He shoots Black Hills 168 grain match ammo through his high dollar rifles, and finds that he gets a huge zero shift from ball ammo through his FAL. Using a good scope, allegedly firmly attached to his FAL, he zeros his rifle with Portugese surplus ammo. Breaks out the box of BH, and his zero shifts up and right about 3". The grouping is not good at all, grouping larger than does his ball ammo group. To be sure it isn't a scope shift or something, he recommences with the ball, and the shots fall in the ball grouping.
That the ammo shoots to a different point of aim doesn't surprise me as much as does the fact that the group is not good at all, like 6" or something.
Oddly, his custom built M14 shoots tighter groups (no surprise) and the zero shift is only upwards an inch or two, and the groupings with the BH are quite tight, as one would expect.
He asks me what is causing this sort of aberrant performance in the FAL, and I don't have an answer. Is it possible that the FAL has a slower twist barrel that won't stabilize 168 grain bullets? What gives here?
Thanks.