That is dangerously poor thinking, and the trap of the antis.A striker fired pistol with no safety (Glock and others )is an accident waiting to happen.
A striker fired pistol with no safety (Glock and others )is an accident waiting to happen.
Youtube host & tactics trainer James Yeager made the point that being in a rush or being careless is the main cause of most ADs with CCW guns or incidents.
Yes, unfortunately, it does. Not only are we paying him to carry a gun, but we (as the public) are placing a special trust in him. And expecting him to live up to a certain standard.Being a police officer doesn't make this any better or worse.
Unfortunately, today we live in an era devoid of accountability. with the exception of the much-maligned Tex Grebner, I cannot recall antone else who was actually responsible for his own actions.back in the day that would get you a week off without pay.
If a gun is falling, let it fall. Unless it is a very old firearm, it is drop safe.
Then I say he needs practice on drawing from a holster or avoiding that part of town. Walking with a gun in hand seems like a real bad idea. What if a good citizen with a conceal gun saw someone with a gun drawn walking toward them?As for why he was handling the gun- one of the early news reports said he planned to have it in his hand as they walked through a parking garage...presumably in a dicey part of town.
Therefore, the best tactic for a firefight is to find a tactical ditch and then tactically dive in.Youtube host & tactics trainer James Yeager made the point that being in a rush or being careless is the main cause of most ADs with CCW guns or incidents.
I am always deeply appreciative that some members of this forum are such skilled practitioners with firearms, in all their many years of experience, as to have never made a mistake with one.
Thankfully, an AD, sweeping someone with a muzzle, etc. is something that never has, or will ever happen to them. It's comforting to know that they have never removed their firearm from a holster except to intentional shoot it. Have never shown a weapon to anyone else. Must give you warm feeling to have never had a moments lapse.
They are quick to find fault with anyone, especially a peace officer who has, and quick to begin the name calling. Thanks to the holier than thou here for showing the rest of us the proper way to deal with something like this. They will no doubt be beatified in firearms heaven.
Did I read that right? They trust the cops to carry on duty, but not off?It was on our news last night too. Typical negligence. One of the reasons our cops can't carry off duty.
My sentiments exactly. I just bought a Glock 42 while another store clerk (with another customer) was railing against Glocks because they don't have an external safety and require you to pull the trigger to field-strip them. I often wonder how all of those thousands of LEO's using Glocks haven't managed to shoot themselves. Sheesh.That is dangerously poor thinking, and the trap of the antis.
Glocks and other striker fired guns have multiple safeties and operate as they should. It's 100% human error. A properly working striker fired or hammer fired gun is equally safe sitting on a table, UNTIL you introduce human folly.
Your "logic" results in MORE and MORE silly safeties and gun mods - which are not the issue. It's why we have high cap magazine restrictions, "bullet buttons," various cosmetic design prohibitions, etc.
IT'S NOT THE GUN, IT'S THE USER!!!!!
You may note that Sunray lives in Canada. Few places in the US make such restrictions on sworn law enforcement -- regardless of what their local laws might be for average citizens.Did I read that right? They trust the cops to carry on duty, but not off?
Well it sure is hard to strike a balance, isn't it? We get just as many complaints that the overall tone here is of cop apologists and "holster sniffers" so I guess you can't please all the people any of the time.Maybe it's just the pronounced anti-police bias among many on this site, and it's quite noticeable in this and other threads. Whether it's the mild donut remark, or the vitriol that comes out every time LEOSA is mentioned, it's pervasive.
Oh? I think I've read plenty of threads of average citizens making terrible mistakes with their guns.Seems there's a certain smirking pleasure here associated with a peace officer who makes a mistake. They make the news when it happens, others do the same but get to just quietly go on their way.
Maybe so. Really doesn't seem relevant to the unwise and careless fellow in this video. It doesn't matter much whether he once wore a badge. Now he gets to wear a bandage ... and a dunce cap, as a warning to others!I think members seem to miss the fact that the gun grabbing protagonist they fear and loath is not the rank and file officer, rather it's the politicians, including those masquerading as police chiefs and commissioners.
I don't think anyone here expects the police to be perfect, nor anyone else to be so. It is utterly fair for us to expect -- nay, DEMAND -- that no one handle firearms in that way and endanger people. It is our duty to demand that, and require it from ourselves and everyone who carries a gun in public.Nobody is perfect, I don't understand why some here expect the police to be.