I prefer a receiver sight for a couple of reasons:
They're cheaper than most high-quality 'scopes. A Williams 'Foolproof' or a Lyman 66A run about $70 retail. Used ones in perfect shape can be had at the shows for much less, especially in the most common applications such as your 94.
I can acquire a good sight picture on my target more quickly with one. YMMV, given a 1X, since it's basically a 'tube'sight with no magnification.
With the exception of a 'Scout' mount, I find that a 'scope makes field carry at the natural balance point somewhat awkward and less secure on almost any LA carbine or rifle.
They're less likely to be damaged in transport or hard use. Their adjustment mechanism is much less delicate and they can't 'fog-up'. Should you get water or debris in the aperture, a quick puff of air will generally clear it. Try that with any optical set-up.
Personally, I think that the only real advantage to a 'scope is in the magnification. Arguments involving the number of 'sighting planes' aside, the only practical advantage IMO is in being able to place your shot better because you can see your optimum target area better. No magnification, no advantage, IMHO.