Police Firearm Incident in Iowa

Status
Not open for further replies.

moewadle

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2006
Messages
848
I am relating this without realizing what all the points of interest might be. However, I think it will be interesting to other members......Iowa City, Iowa is a college city of about 60,000 people. With another small town adjacent to it the urban area is a total of about 75,000 for what that is worth. It is home to the the U of Iowa with a student body of about 23,000 I guess. Anyway, several years ago there was an incident that occurred about midnight I think. The local police were checking doors at this row of businesses in a quiet area of the city. This was not a primary business area, perhaps it was sort of like a small, quiet strip mall. I am not absolutely positive but something like that. The police standing policy at the time was to check the doors and if a door was not secure to enter and investigate. There was no policy to call the business owner. So, two officers found a door unlocked. They called for their supervisor who arrived. One officer then pulled his weapon, opened the unlocked (or ajar?) door and entered to investigate. Immediately on entering he encountered a man who it was later determined was on the phone. I do not know if the man was sitting or standing. The officer, for whatever reason, fired at the man and killed him. Well, the man was the owner of the business, an art and sculptor studio. The owner was an artist and was legitimately in his studio working late at night. I forget what the young officer is reported to have told his chief, something like, "I panicked," or something like that. Those are not his exact words. It actually sounds like to me, but this is only my opinion, that he thought the phone was a weapon and shot before he clearly assessed. In any event the police officer resigned from the force and would have been fired anyway. The County Attorney (District Attorney) convened a grand jury who found no reason to indict the police officer. The city did not contest the law suit brought by the dead man's parents (he was single) and the city willingly paid $3 million dollars to the estate. The city also ensured that the police department changed the policy about investigating unlocked doors of businesses late at night. I think the policy now is to try and reach the business owner by phone. I also think that going in with a weapon in hand is forbidden without further suspicion of a break-in. So, beyond this being a point of interest to members I have one question for those LE Officers out there. In your jurisdiction what is the policy on drawing a weapon before going in to a situation as described above?

Thanks, Moe
 
If I entered on a possible break-in, yes, I'd have weapon drawn (probably). I'd also have a flashlight in the other hand.

Hate it for the owner and his family. Also hate it for the new cop. Sure, he should resign, but he's still going to have to live with this mistake. Sounds like he was so startled by finding the guy that he shot him before assessing the situation.
 
Well sure i would go with a gun, but only if i really suspect something is going in there. You cant just go inside someones house armed because the door is open. Imagine you are sitting on your house talking on the phone and cleaning your gun and someone enters, i would had shoot the officer for sure, i would not imagine someone armed interrupt inside my house. Its very dangeorus for both the house owner and the officer. Its pretty strange he did not knock on the door first even on movies you see when a cop goes inside a house he talks loud, the first rule is to identify yourself as a police officer when you are going in. Second thats why you should never have your finger on the trigger, so when you panic you dont shoot the first face you see. Im pretty sad for the officer, this kind of things happen all the time. Some people are just dangerous with a gun, and someone afraid with a gun is more dangerous.
 
This incident was quite a few years ago.

FWIW, I had previously solicited the ICPD for my judgmental shooting training program. They said they weren't interested because they "didn't need that type of training." :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :cuss:
 
Stolen Lives Project

August 21, 1996. Iowa City:
While Eric was in his art studio, the police entered the studio, unannounced, shot and killed Eric the minute they opened the door. They said they were in the building looking for a suspected burglar. The cop who shot him, Officer Jeffrey Gillaspie, first claimed that he thought the phone in Eric’s hand was a gun and he was firing in self-defense. But later, the cop changed his story to say that he accidentally fired his gun when he “flinched.” The county prosecutor first termed the shooting “unjustified,” but after a lengthy investigation, he announced that no criminal charges would be filed against the officer. He said that Officer Gillaspie was guilty of negligence, police malpractice, and that he used deadly force without justification, but that he did not have a willful and wanton disregard for human life.

Copyright ©1999 by the Stolen Lives Project. All Rights Reserved.
If you quote, reference, excerpt, insert, transmit, or copy any part of this edition, you need to acknowledge the Stolen Lives Project.
 
Yes, that previous entry from Stolen Lives Project is pretty darn accurate as I remember the news media reporting it now. I didn't remember that the shooting officer mentioned the phone but I had always thought that must have been what happened, he took the phone for a weapon and shot. I remember now that he had been quoted by the police chief as saying he, "flinched." It is a very sad story because the shooter will live with this the rest of his life, an innocent man is dead, and the families of both will be affected for the rest of their respective lives. I think a lot of this had to do with poor police procedure and an officer who was scared, jumpy, and had his finger on the trigger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top