Fastcast
Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2008
- Messages
- 874
Your argument is not topical; the SCOTUS already ruled that restrictions and oversight do not qualify as infringement.
If you want to live in a country with absolute freedom, I'm sure there are some areas of sub Saharan Africa or mountainous Afghanistan that would suit your need for elbow room.
Well, I see your argument as passive/submissive and exactly why we live in a Country now that doesn't resemble the documented, rightful laws of this land and the unalienable rights for all men.....Some rights are not given by a piece of paper and our elected masters.
As SCOTUS continues to chip away at 1A & 2A does that make it justified?....Should we just lay down and roll over or should we continue to push our position to elect constitutionally sound politicians? Who will appoint like minded supreme justices.
Seems like you enjoy and feel more secure with even more oversight and restrictions. Good thing the founders didn't think like you or there would be no USA today.