• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Puma M92 Range Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cosmoline

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
23,646
Location
Los Anchorage
I picked up a used Puma M92 a few weeks ago and finally had a chance to ring it out yesterday. Great rifle! Even stiff, the action is very fast and the rifle light in the hand. I wasn't able to force a jam even cylcing as fast as I could at the range. This may be a 115 year old design, but I would not want to get crosswise with one. It's fast, light, and with .44 Magnum HP's packs a truly massive punch. I could hear the big slugs smack into the backstop at 100 yards each time. Real purty. I see why John Wayne carried one back in time to the 1870's in all those Westerns.

A few observations:

--The safety device is weird and annoying, but takes about two minutes to remove. That leaves a hole in the bolt, but it would be easy to plug if you wanted to.

--The carbine is 20", but still extremely light and handy. Even with a fully loaded tube it balanced well.

--Feeding is 100% reliable except with big hardcast FN bullets set at or above max OAL. These get stuck and keep the carrier from elevating. It's probably possible to fix this by filing down the stop on the elevator, but given that it works so well with everything else I'm not going to leave it alone. I handload and it's an easy enough matter to just set the bullets down further and stay back from max OAL.

--Accuracy was acceptable to good. My tests were rough, but it appeared to shoot quite well with mid-range bullets and acceptable with heavier ones.

--Recoil was non-existent for cowboy level SWC's. Talk about rapid fire! I was able to cap them off faster than an SKS. Felt recoil was mild with the powerhouse 300 grain bear loads, though the tube took a pounding and eventually came loose and started shifting forward.

--The action is stiff to begin with, but loosens as you work with it. From what I've heard the Pumas get really nice after some use.

--The trigger is not so great. It works, but is real tight. I'm going to get an aftermarket one for it.

--The front sight is a nice sourdough and works just fine. It looks like it would take plenty of abuse.

--The rear sight from the factory is a very cheaply made sheet metal tangent, and wiggles back and forth in recoil. Totally useless. So I replaced it with an old front Mojo aperture after some work with the file. I set it to hit POA with stout loads at about 100 yards, but it could be set lower with more file work.

--I put a Wild West light mount on the tube. These require no gunsmithing and are pretty easy to remove.


Brutus.jpg

sight2.jpg
 
VERY nice!!!!

Beautiful rifle....great report. I don't own a puma (Mines an 1894c), but you can't argue with pistol caliber lever guns for fun and practicality. Just.....er....
please don't hang any more tactical stuff on it;)
 
I know, everybody is giving be flak about that. But bill larry is right--it does make it more practical for use as a brush gun. Esp. with all the things that go bump in the night around these parts.

Though folks think of these as cowboy guns, the 92 remains a perfectly fine combat weapon even today. Rate of fire is on par with an SKS, and you can top off the magazine as needed. The .44 Mag becomes a very nasty intermediate cartridge when fired from the long barrel, with substantially more knockdown power than either a 5.56 or 7.62x39, at least inside 150 yards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top