campergeek
Member
Lately I've been getting an increasing number of fund-raising calls from the RNC or other organizations supporting Pres. Bush's campaign, which has given me ample opportunity to vent. Here's my typical tactic, which is open to criticism (let me get my flame suit on). Feel free to steal and use as your own, modifying as you see fit.
Once the caller gets through their initial appeal, I'll respond by saying that President Bush has said that he will sign a renewal of the AWB into law. I'll let the caller know that I feel that this is a terrible piece of legislation and that I will not contribute to President Bush's campaign unless he takes back that pledge. (I also sent an e-mail to the RNC website pledging a contribution if he does so.)
Then they counter with their canned response, to which I'll respond that I'm uncomfortable with the direction that our government is taking under the restrictions on constitutional freedoms within the patriot act. I usually say that I may be able to trust the Bush administration with some of the powers given to federal authorities, but can I trust future administrations? My closer is usually that I cannot, in good conscience, contribute to any president who so freely robs me of my liberties in the name of safety.
Then I hang up.
Now, between you, me and the other hundred people who read this, any contribution I personally make or withhold is really not significant. In addition, in each individual case I don't have much optimisim that my statements will go much farther than the short-term memory of the fund-raiser to be forgotten before they go on to the next auto-dialed number. However, I have this little fantasy that perhaps they have some online entry field in which they provide a note as to WHY the called individual is not contributing, and maybe somebody is monitoring these entries for the purpose of improving their success rate, AND maybe I'm not the only one saying these things, so those monitoring will start to notice a trend. In my wildest fantasy, there is enough of a trend that word will get back to Bush's handlers that perhaps he isn't scoring enough points with the 2A crowd, this is costing his campaign money and could cost him the election.
Of course, if there's to be any truth to my fantasy, then I can't be the only voice speaking out. Is anyone else following similar tactics?
Once the caller gets through their initial appeal, I'll respond by saying that President Bush has said that he will sign a renewal of the AWB into law. I'll let the caller know that I feel that this is a terrible piece of legislation and that I will not contribute to President Bush's campaign unless he takes back that pledge. (I also sent an e-mail to the RNC website pledging a contribution if he does so.)
Then they counter with their canned response, to which I'll respond that I'm uncomfortable with the direction that our government is taking under the restrictions on constitutional freedoms within the patriot act. I usually say that I may be able to trust the Bush administration with some of the powers given to federal authorities, but can I trust future administrations? My closer is usually that I cannot, in good conscience, contribute to any president who so freely robs me of my liberties in the name of safety.
Then I hang up.
Now, between you, me and the other hundred people who read this, any contribution I personally make or withhold is really not significant. In addition, in each individual case I don't have much optimisim that my statements will go much farther than the short-term memory of the fund-raiser to be forgotten before they go on to the next auto-dialed number. However, I have this little fantasy that perhaps they have some online entry field in which they provide a note as to WHY the called individual is not contributing, and maybe somebody is monitoring these entries for the purpose of improving their success rate, AND maybe I'm not the only one saying these things, so those monitoring will start to notice a trend. In my wildest fantasy, there is enough of a trend that word will get back to Bush's handlers that perhaps he isn't scoring enough points with the 2A crowd, this is costing his campaign money and could cost him the election.
Of course, if there's to be any truth to my fantasy, then I can't be the only voice speaking out. Is anyone else following similar tactics?