SpeedAKL
Member
Just picked up the paper this morning (yeah its 11 AM but hey I sleep in late) and saw Richmond Times Dispatch columnist Michael Paul Williams going off on Kalashnikov rifles. A high school student in nearby Powhatan County was murdered by three people and apparently died of 7.62x39 fired from an AK. The article did not specify whether the rounds were from an AK-47 or a version from a different country, whether the gun was auto or semi, or whether it was bought legally or acquired illegally.
What he did say was that we should own assault rifles, they're unnecessary, no man needs a 50-round clip, AKs are dangerous to Richmond city, etc etc etc....basically, the usual anti-gun arguments that can be summed up as "Nobody needs a weapon like this, so let's ban it". He quoted a few lines from a Virginia CDL guy but quoted a fair bit more from the Brady Bunch, including a statistic that "assault rifle" crime went down 66% after the 1994 ban was introduced and since has become "pervasive" after it expired. Is this true?
Anyway, here is the link to the article. An area to post comments is linked at the bottom. To get published in the paper, write to [email protected] and Mr. William's e-mail address is [email protected]
What he did say was that we should own assault rifles, they're unnecessary, no man needs a 50-round clip, AKs are dangerous to Richmond city, etc etc etc....basically, the usual anti-gun arguments that can be summed up as "Nobody needs a weapon like this, so let's ban it". He quoted a few lines from a Virginia CDL guy but quoted a fair bit more from the Brady Bunch, including a statistic that "assault rifle" crime went down 66% after the 1994 ban was introduced and since has become "pervasive" after it expired. Is this true?
Anyway, here is the link to the article. An area to post comments is linked at the bottom. To get published in the paper, write to [email protected] and Mr. William's e-mail address is [email protected]