Ron Paul "supporters" - How to be your own worst enemies.

[Sage of Seattle]

Here's what the hell I'm talking about.

Some people on this board get the impression you're bashing Ron Paul. You defended yourself by saying "reality check = bashing?" You've been saying (If I'm not mistaken) that impressions matter when it comes to trying to get your message across. Am I more clear?

Lunchmeat specifically asked if YOU take to task those he mentioned in post 18. I guess the answer is no.

I personally don't think you're bashing Ron Paul, as a matter of fact. I see the message you're trying to say.

You apparently have trouble following links, and are unfamiliar with sites like Instapundit?

There's no need to be insulting to me, I have no trouble following links. I am unfamiliar with Instapundit because I am frankly more interested in your opinion.

 

[ArmedBear]

lunchmeat, that's got nothing to do with anything in this thread. And "hey, look over there!" sounds like you and your Paulista buddies here.

Nice post count. Did you just come here to spam Ron Paul posts?

But at least you admit your immaturity. That's a start.

For the record, I will decide on "my" candidate when it matters. As of now, none of them get my wholehearted support. I won't vote for any of the three stooges being pushed by the MSM, but I truly don't think that will be an issue come next year when there is actually an election.

And also for the record, Reason Magazine rates Guiliani highest behind Paul. I don't agree. But I find it interesting.

 

[ArmedBear]

There's no need to be insulting to me, I have no trouble following links. I am unfamiliar with Instapundit because I am frankly more interested in your opinion.

If you don't want someone to respond to your reiteration of someone else's semi-coherent posts as if you're speaking for yourself, then you will need to make yourself a little clearer.

I don't really care if you're interested in my opinion about Ron Paul. If you're yet another poster here with that sole purpose, please go away.

unchmeat specifically asked if YOU take to task those he mentioned in post 18. I guess the answer is no.

I'm sure that lunchmeat can speak for him/herself. I know I don't need you to speak for me.

I personally don't think you're bashing Ron Paul, as a matter of fact. I see the message you're trying to say.

Then what was the point of your post? You and lunchmeat are buddies from somewhere, and you generally speak for him/her?

I've made my opinion about Paul very, very clear in a few long posts here recently. It seems like everyone who frequents this board, and is interested, knows what my opinion is. It's all available for you to read, also.

My opinion about the plethora of Paulista posters here with low counts? They (you) leave a bad impression. The Deaniacs of 2007. People flooding every corner of the Internet to create "buzz", but who haven't heard of some of the most significant libertarian blogs out there. Silly, annoying n00bs. That's my impression. Right or wrong, that's how it looks to me, and to a LOT of other people who might want to see someone like Paul have a shot, and who will matter when the GOP primary comes around.

And I say that as someone who agrees with Ron Paul in many ways.

 

[pcosmar]

Little Green Footballs and the pajamas media as a whole came out as anti Paul several weeks ago. They have been on the attack from the start, they are Pro War and will not listen to a reasoned argument against it.
I have no doubt that they have gotten some poor responses, and I do not think that helps Ron Paul. I also do not think that even a polite reasoned response with facts presented would change their mind.
I won't waste my time.
I will support Dr. Paul, and present the facts to those that will listen.

 

[pax]

Wow, this one sure got personal in a hurry.

Closed.

pax