I hope not.
IMO- there is w-a-y too much "line extension" within the mfgs today already. Add the other mfgs and their "line extensions". Granted there is that dealie about Free Market and all. The competition for contracts as well. What we have is Quanity not Quality - in this case 1911s.
I figure the Ruger and Smith folks do allright with their respective metallury processes, making stuff for other folks or other product lines already.
I sort of have mixed feelings about something. For Too many years the 1911 was a combat pistol that worked. Folks were
Trained to use the pistiol as designed. Then the pistol was
adapted to fit other roles, like Bulls eye, IDPA, IPSC...etc. There is a place for tool designed for a task, Military ,SWAT, LEO have some tasks that average citizen does not need.
I sometimes think the greed of money and ownership short circuits folks gray matter. Train to use tool and fit as need to fit you and the task. Not buy skill and targets...especially when it means short cuts and quanity are more important than quality.
Sheesh...I do not like front slide serrations on the 1911. I do no like the all the writing on the Rugers...gonna be hell to read all that crap in b/t the serrations...
Besides all the Rugers I have shot in 9mm and 45ACP are reliable, affordable, work out of the box. Sure they may not be the prettiest, hippest , coolest gun out there , but they work. Civilians and small town LEOs want value for dollar...why would Ruger want to muck up something they already fill a slot for? They catch enough hell for Bill Rugers statement all those years ago...Why open themselves to more controversy? Shut up and sell what they have. An Alternative to the 1911 design, the Sig, the HK, the Glock...