Zaydok Allen
Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 13,275
Why?I already own a 617 but am afraid to take it with me in the woods......
Why?I already own a 617 but am afraid to take it with me in the woods......
Yeah, and the LCR is well known for having a very smooth trigger pull.This gun is touted as having a better trigger over the SP version, something the Ruger DA .22s desperately need.
Must have been a pretty good sales slump.
I would like to see a LCR 3" in 22LR (with exposed hammer).
There already was a GP 100 .327 MAG, my cousin has a 7 shot GP100 like this one:327 Federal Magnum up next !
That was how the first LCRx in .38 Spec. was being marketed, but I don't see a .38 as a "kit gun."I'm with this.
A 3"-4" LCR 22lr with exposed hammer would be considered a modern day 'kit gun' / 'woods gun'. Id be interested in that too.
When the .327 first hit the scene Ruger was making GP's chambered for them. They stopped producing them years ago due to low sales and I doubt they'll make a comeback.C0untZer0 said:Yes there were GP100s chambered in .327 Federal Magnum but the last time I checked they were out of them
But with an under lug. The new style would be great in .32 Log, .32 Mag, or .327 Federal.There already was a GP 100 .327 MAG, my cousin has a 7 shot GP100 like this one:
http://www.realguns.com/articles/256.htm