I was told that S&W Model 13 wasn’t very popular. Why is that? I got this one and I don’t see anything wrong with it.
The simple answer is: The fixed sight versions of the K-Frames (and later L-Frames) were the
economy models of their time (1970s), designed for ease on the wallet at a time when most police agencies carried revolvers. They were considerably less expensive than the flagship models with adjustable sights, target grips, and other cosmetic improvements.
The target market was the cash poor new patrol officer looking for a duty revolver at a time when many cops were required / allowed to purchase their own revolver. They were also attractive to departments looking for economical fleet purchase for department-wide issue. Pricewise, Model 13s were the Glocks of their day.
Colt, Smith & Wesson, and Ruger all offered plain-jane fixed sighted versions of their .38 Special and .357 revolvers. These sold at a much lower price point than their higher end versions (Models 19, 66, 686, 586, 27, Python, Security Six, etc.).
There is nothing whatsoever wrong with the Model 13 (or any of the rest of Smith & Wessons fixed sighted revolvers). My very first new-purchase revolver was a Model 65, the stainless counterpart to the Model 13. I dearly wish I still owned that handgun. :banghead:
The bull barreled, fixed sight K-Frames are now recognized as the some of the best gunfighting revolvers Smith ever produced. Snag free clean lines, excellent size and weight for carry, great ergonomics, and hard hitting accuracy at combat distance. Everything you need and nothing you don't.
Your Model 13 a fine revolver and worth more today than what it cost brand-new.