Gewehr98, you keep bitching about the lawyers.
To me the thing jsut sounds like a new twist on the set trigger. In case, I'm missing something, set triggers existed long before the current fondess for litigation at the drop of a hat.
Hey it might be the nicest liverwurst you've ever tasted, and you might really be a goose liver pate guy and can't justify for settling for less.
However, I have to say that if you go looking at the average deer rifle, even a remington 700 based one. And you look at the accutriggers vs. the trigger jobs you find on the off the shelf average hunter's rifle, it is better than the stock nasty trigger on the 700 bargain models, and strikes me as a hell of lot safer being toted through the underbrush than most of the local trigger jobs I have run into.
Lawyers or no, I can't argue that as a really bad thing. That argument doesn't real have anything to do with the world of high end benchrest shooting or those who are tactical operators or just play one on TV.
To me the thing jsut sounds like a new twist on the set trigger. In case, I'm missing something, set triggers existed long before the current fondess for litigation at the drop of a hat.
Hey it might be the nicest liverwurst you've ever tasted, and you might really be a goose liver pate guy and can't justify for settling for less.
However, I have to say that if you go looking at the average deer rifle, even a remington 700 based one. And you look at the accutriggers vs. the trigger jobs you find on the off the shelf average hunter's rifle, it is better than the stock nasty trigger on the 700 bargain models, and strikes me as a hell of lot safer being toted through the underbrush than most of the local trigger jobs I have run into.
Lawyers or no, I can't argue that as a really bad thing. That argument doesn't real have anything to do with the world of high end benchrest shooting or those who are tactical operators or just play one on TV.
