Woo-hooo...another anti-Bush poster....
Hello idd:
************************************************************
The Washington Post, 19 January 2004
"Arms issue seen as hurting US credibility"
************************************************************
Your source is noted for it's lack of success at factual and unbiased reporting....especially concerning the Iraq war.
************************************************************
"<whew> We stopped 'em in the nick of time. And to think that before the US invaded Iraq thay were just banging on our door, amassing troops and ships out in the Gulf of Mexico, just itching to get us."
************************************************************
Actually, not quite in the nick of time...there was a World Trade Center in New York City before some folks flew aircraft into it.
************************************************************
Boy we sure showed them.
************************************************************
We are, indeed "showing them"...and the majority are paying attention.
************************************************************
The State Department's own annual study, Patterns of Global Terrorism, could not list any serious act of international terrorism connected to the government of Iraq.
************************************************************
Uh-huh. And this is a surprise? Have you not been paying attention to the woeful failures of various and sundry U.S. intelligence agencies?
************************************************************
Stabilization? That remains to be seen. "Bush Administration Faces Growing Chaos in Iraq While Some Plan Expansion of War," By Jim Lobe,
***********************************************************
Jim Lobe is another of those folks who write what they feel, not what they see.
***********************************************************
“CIA officers in Iraq are warning that the country may be on a path to civil war,†was the lead sentence in a front-page article in the Philadelphia Inquirer on January 22.
************************************************************
It is a pity so much of the U.S. media is controlled by leftist anti-Bush concerns. The Philidelphia Inquirer has never, to my knowledge, run a positive story on the Bush Administration. I wonder, do they identify their "CIA officers"?
************************************************************
" The presence of a powerful secret police loyal to the Americans will mean that the new Iraqi political regime will not stray outside the parameters that the US wants to set. To begin with, the new Iraqi government will reign but not rule.â€
************************************************************
And this is not prudent in what way? With all the anti-Bush folks squealing about a 'potential theocracy' and 'fundamentalist state', how does this possibility strike them as unwise?
************************************************************
Maybe it will another one of those death squad democracies that the CIA is so famous for.
************************************************************
Name one "death squad democracy" that you have incontrovertible proof of U.S. led "death squads" operating in.
Cite your evidence, or let the myths rest.